Table 1.
Control (C) | Youth Only (Y) | Parent + Youth Intervention (PY) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
School | 5 | 6 | 8 | Total | 3 | 4 | 7 | Total | 1 | 2 | 9 | Total | Total |
Gender (M) N (%) | 17 (33) | 26 (46) | 16 (62) | 59 (44) | 23 (51) | 31 (54) | 19 (61) | 73 (55) | 15 (54) | 36 (60) | 14 (54) | 65 (57) | 197 (52) |
Age M (SD) | 12.45 (.64)a | 12.25 (.47) | 12.19 (.40) | 12.32 (.54) | 12.13 (.41) | 12.14 (.44) | 12.16 (.45) | 12.14 (.43) | 12.32 (.55) | 12.10 (.35) | 12.00 (.40) | 12.13 (.43) | 12.20 (.48) |
Mexican heritage, N (%) | 46 (89) | 51 (90) | 22 (88) | 119 (89) | 40 (89) | 57 (98) | 30 (97) | 127 (95) | 22 (79) | 57 (93) | 23 (92) | 102 (89) | 348 (91) |
Free or reduced lunch, N (%) | 47 (92) | 55 (98) | 25 (100) | 127 (96) | 44 (98) | 52 (91) | 26 (87) | 122 (92) | 28 (100) | 59 (98) | 23 (88) | 110 (96) | 359 (95) |
N (%) | 55 | 58 | 26 | 139 (35) | 46 | 59 | 31 | 136 (35) | 28 | 63 | 27 | 118 (30) | 393 |
Post hoc comparisons revealed that students at School 5 were significantly older than students at Schools 2, 3, 4, and 9. No other significant differences were found across schools or across conditions.