Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Soc Work Pract. 2014 May;24(3):310–320. doi: 10.1177/1049731513498828

Table 1.

Descriptive Characteristics of Seventh-Grade Youth of Parent Participants Across Schools and Conditions (N — 393).

Control (C) Youth Only (Y) Parent + Youth Intervention (PY)



School 5 6 8 Total 3 4 7 Total 1 2 9 Total Total
Gender (M) N (%) 17 (33) 26 (46) 16 (62) 59 (44) 23 (51) 31 (54) 19 (61) 73 (55) 15 (54) 36 (60) 14 (54) 65 (57) 197 (52)
Age M (SD) 12.45 (.64)a 12.25 (.47) 12.19 (.40) 12.32 (.54) 12.13 (.41) 12.14 (.44) 12.16 (.45) 12.14 (.43) 12.32 (.55) 12.10 (.35) 12.00 (.40) 12.13 (.43) 12.20 (.48)
Mexican heritage, N (%) 46 (89) 51 (90) 22 (88) 119 (89) 40 (89) 57 (98) 30 (97) 127 (95) 22 (79) 57 (93) 23 (92) 102 (89) 348 (91)
Free or reduced lunch, N (%) 47 (92) 55 (98) 25 (100) 127 (96) 44 (98) 52 (91) 26 (87) 122 (92) 28 (100) 59 (98) 23 (88) 110 (96) 359 (95)
N (%) 55 58 26 139 (35) 46 59 31 136 (35) 28 63 27 118 (30) 393
a

Post hoc comparisons revealed that students at School 5 were significantly older than students at Schools 2, 3, 4, and 9. No other significant differences were found across schools or across conditions.