Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Soc Work Pract. 2014 May;24(3):310–320. doi: 10.1177/1049731513498828

Table 4.

Unstandardized, Standardized, and Significance Levels for Positive Parenting Model (N — 393).

Parameter Estimate Indicator Variables Unstandardized B (SE) Standardized β P
Measurement model estimates
 Positive parenting baseline (W1) → X1 1.00 .54 (.06) NA
X2 .97 (.17) .46 (.05) .00
X3 1.76 (.29) .66 (.06) .00
X4 1.31 (.26) .47 (.05) .00
 Positive parenting follow-up (W2) → X5 1.00 .35 (.06) NA
X6 1.00 (.20) .33 (.06) .00
X7 3.40 (.65) .77 (.05) .00
X8 2.76 (.56) .62 (.05) .00
Structural model
 Positive parenting baseline → follow-up .40 (.10) .66 (.06) .00
 Parenting intervention (vs. youth-only) → follow-up .04 (.02) .13 (.06) .04
 Control (vs. youth-only) → follow-up .02 (.02) .07 (.06) .23
 Residual for positive parenting follow-up .01 (.00) .56 (.08) .00

Note. χ2 (27) = 39.51, p = .06, model fit: root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .03, comparative fix index (CFI) = .98, Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) = .96. R2 = .443 (SE = .08).