Table 4.
Summary of hierarchical regression analyses predicting social functioning and quality of life in early psychosis patients
| ß | t | p | R 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicting SOFAS Scores of Social Functioning | ||||
| Step 1 | .09 | |||
| Neurocognition | .30 | 1.39 | .18 | |
| Step 2 | .09 | |||
| Neurocognition | .34 | 1.12 | .28 | |
| ToM | -.07 | .21 | .83 | |
| Step 3 | .30 | |||
| Neurocognition | .20 | .70 | .49 | |
| ToM | -.22 | .76 | .46 | |
| Negative symptoms | -.53 | 2.30 | .03* | |
| Predicting QLS Scores of Life Satisfaction | ||||
| Step 1 | .29 | |||
| Neurocognition | .53 | 2.83 | .01 | |
| Step 2 | .29 | |||
| Neurocognition | .60 | 2.22 | .04 | |
| ToM | -.09 | .33 | .74 | |
| Step 3 | .42 | |||
| Neurocognition | .48 | 1.89 | .08 | |
| ToM | -.21 | .81 | .43 | |
| Negative symptoms | -.42 | 2.00 | .06! | |
*p < .05; ! p < .10.