Table 3.
Perceived Effectiveness: Paging System Versus HCGM Application, as Rated by HCGM Participants (n = 41)
Question | Baseline Average Rating of Paging System* | Post-Study Average Rating of HCGM Application | P Value† |
---|---|---|---|
Rate the effectiveness of each in allowing you to… | |||
Communicate your thoughts clearly | 3.194 | 3.806 | 0.010 |
Communicate your thoughts efficiently | 3.200 | 3.829 | 0.009 |
Send messages to other hospital staff | 3.543 | 3.571 | 0.480 |
Receive messages/stay informed in real time | 3.222 | 3.306 | 0.405 |
Rate the effectiveness of each in integrating into your workflow during… | |||
Work rounds | 2.313 | 3.000 | 0.018 |
Patient discharge | 2.448 | 3.276 | 0.012 |
Patient admissions | 2.862 | 2.621 | 0.238 |
Teaching sessions | 2.292 | 2.458 | 0.448 |
Overall satisfaction | 2.811 | 3.459 | 0.003 |
NOTE: Abbreviations: HCGM, HIPAA-compliant group messaging.
HCGM participants' baseline average ratings of the paging system in this table differ slightly from those presented in Table3 due to the inclusion of different paired datasets (a result of different missing data values).
P values are unadjusted.