Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 11;16(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12968-014-0098-5

Table 3.

CMR (n = 27) and SPECT (n = 25) findings*

Stress CMR Coronary ostia LGE SPECT
Patient 1 N N No A – SDS 3
Patient 2 N N No N
Patient 3 N N No N
Patient 4 N N No N
Patient 5 N N No N
Patient 6 N N No A – SDS 2
Patient 7 N N Yes A – SDS 2
Patient 8 N N No E – SDS 0
Patient 9 N N No N
Patient 10 N N No N
Patient 11 N A Yes N
Patient 12 N A No N
Patient 13 N N No E – SDS 0
Patient 14 N N No Declined
Patient 15 N N No A – SDS 3
Patient 16 N N No N
Patient 17 N N No A – SDS 2
Patient 18 N N No A – SDS 2
Patient 19 N N No N
Patient 22 § N A No A – SDS 4
Patient 23 N N No N
Patient 25 N N Yes A – SDS 0
Patient 26 N N No E – SDS 0
Patient 27 N N No E – SDS 0
Patient 28 N N No A – SDS 5
Patient 29 N N No Declined
Patient 30 N N No N

*Note that patients are not all numbered consecutively.

§Patient 22 was scored as having an abnormal proximal right coronary artery on CMR, however SPECT perfusion defect was in the LAD territory with normal left main ostium and no LGE on CMR (see text).

N = normal; A = abnormal; E = equivocal; LGE = late gadolinium enhancement; SDS = summed difference score; N/A = not available.