Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 11;10(12):e1004011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004011

Figure 1. Tissue preparation setup and comparisons of control, cAF, and cAFalt tissue during pacing.

Figure 1

(A) Atrial tissue mesh with stimulus and recording electrodes. (B) APD restitution curves for control tissue (black), cAF-remodeled tissue [19] (red), and cAFalt tissue with APD alternans onset and amplitude matching clinical data [8] (dotted red line). The RyR inactivation rate constant (kiCa) was reduced 50% in the cAF model to create the cAFalt model. APs (C) and CaTs (D) recorded from the last two beats at 400-ms pacing CL. Alternans are present in the cAFalt tissue but not in control or cAF tissue.