Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 11;9(12):e114924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114924

Table 4. Facility-level WSC DID analysis results.

Dependent variables Baseline Follow-up Difference 1 DID
WSC total score (SE)
Intervention N = 9 N = 9
31.1(0.87) 32.3(0.81) 1.2 (0.85) (p = 0.17)
Control N = 10 N = 10
31.4(0.57) 31.6(0.42) 0.2 (0.31) (p = 0.61)
Difference 2 −0.3(1.02) 0.7(0.89) 1.0 (0.9)
(p = 0.75) (p = 0.38) (p = 0.24)
Horizontal WSC score (SE)
Intervention N = 9 N = 9
19.4(0.43) 19.9(0.50) 0.5 (0.36) (p = 0.21)
Control N = 10 N = 10
19.5(0.37) 19.6(0.27) 0.1(0.27) (p = 0.57)
Difference 2 −0.1(0.57) 0.3(0.56) 0.4 (0.45)
(p = 0.94) (p = 0.6) (p = 0.46)
Vertical WSC score (SE)
Intervention N = 9 N = 9
11.6(0.46) 12.4(0.33) 0.8(0.51) (p = 0.16)
Control N = 10 N = 10
11.9(0.23) 11.9(0.23) 0(0.09) (p = 0.9)
Difference 2 −0.3(0.49) 0.5(0.4) 0.8(0.52)
(p = 0.57) (p = 0.21) (p = 0.16)

* Welch's t test was used when two samples had unequal variances. Paired t test was only used to test the differences between the baseline and follow-up WSC scores.

*The values in the brackets are SEs.

*Difference1 =  Follow-up – Baseline; Difference 2 =  intervention – control; DID =  Difference 1 (intervention)-Difference 1 (control).