Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan;76(1):133–142.

Table 1.

Internal consistency estimates (Cronbach’s α) at Wave 1 for full sample and by race/ethnicity

graphic file with name jsad133tbl1.jpg

Race/ethnicity
Scale Full sample Cronbach’s α [95% CI] (N = 1,932) AI Cronbach’s α [95% CI] (n = 435) AI and White Cronbach’s α [95% CI] (n = 352) White Cronbach’s α [95% CI] (n = 901) p
Alcohol Availabilitya .83 [.82, .84] .83 [.80, .85] .79 [.75, .82] .84 [.82, .85] .02
Drinking Places .89 [.88, .90] .88 [.86, .89] .89 [.87, .91] .90 [.89, .91] .18
Alcohol Acquisition .89 [.88, .90] .88 [.86, .90] .88 [.86, .90] .89 [.88, .90] .60
Police Enforcementb .79 [.78, .81] .79 [.76, .83] .77 [.73, .81] .78 [.75, .80] .78
Alcohol Norms .65 [.63, .68] .66 [.61, .71] .61 [.55, .67] .68 [.64, .71] .17
Alcohol Expectancies .73 [.71, .74] .74 [.70, .77] .68 [.63, .73] .74 [.71, .76] .05
Social Support .82 [.81, .83] .81 [.78, .84] .81 [.77, .84] .83 [.82, .85] .49
Parent Communication .70 [.68, .72] .73 [.69, .77] .71 [.65, .76] .69 [.66, .73] .57
DUI Risk .56 [.53, .59] .46 [.37, .54] .62 [.54, .68] .63 [.58, .67] .01
Alcohol Consequences .98 [.98, .98] .98 [.97, .98] .98 [.98, .99] .98 [.98, .98] 1.00
Adult Problems .58 [.54, .61] .58 [.49, .65] .57 [.47, .65] .60 [.54, .65] .90
Early Alcohol Risk .87 [.86, .88] .87 [.85, .89] .87 [.84, .89] .88 [.86, .89] .77
Socioeconomic Status .59 [.56, .61] .57 [.50, .63] .55 [.48, .62] .62 [.58, .66] .29
Depression .84 [.83, .85] .86 [.84, .88] .82 [.79, .85] .85 [.83, .86] .06
AI Cultural Identity .89 [.89, .90] .91 [.89, .92] .87 [.84, .89] .84 [.82, .85] <.01
White Cultural Identity .93 [.92, .93] .93 [.92, .94] .92 [.91, .94] .92 [.91, .93] .42

Notes: Full sample includes n = 244 students who were other or missing race/ethnicity. AI = American Indian; CI = confidence interval; DUI: driving under the influence of alcohol.

a

Alcohol availability = perceived alcohol availability;

b

police enforcement = perceived police enforcement.