Table 2.

Test–retest reliabilities from Wave 2 to Wave 3 (2–3 month time lag) for full sample and by race/ethnicity

		Race/ethnicity
Scale	Full sample r [95%CI] (n = 1,592)	AI r [95%CI] (n = 306)	AI and White r [95%CI] (n = 263)	White r [95%CI] (n = 705)	Group diff. p
Alcohol Availabilitya	.70 [.67, .73]	.66 [.59, .72]	.71 [.64, .77]	.72 [.68, .76]	.12
Drinking Places	.52 [.49, .56]	.51 [.42, .59]	.58 [.49, .66]	.52 [.46, .57]	.28
Alcohol Acquisition	.53 [.49, .57]	.54 [.45, .61]	.51 [.41, .60]	.58 [.53, .63]	.25
Police Enforcementb	.52 [.48, .56]	.51 [.42, .59]	.49 [.39, .58]	.54 [.48, .59]	.50
Alcohol Norms	.72 [.69, .74]	.69 [.63, .75]	.68 [.61, .74]	.73 [.70, .77]	.16
Alcohol Expectancies	.73 [.70, .75]	.73 [.67, .78]	.74 [.68, .79]	.74 [.70, .77]	.88
Social Support	.63 [.60, .66]	.62 [.55, .69]	.60 [.52, .68]	.62 [.57, .67]	.89
Parent Communication	.69 [.66, .71]	.66 [.59, .72]	.70 [.63, .76]	.70 [.66, .73]	.43
DUI Risk	.49 [.45, .53]	.47 [.38, .56]	.44 [.34, .53]	.61 [.56, .66]	<.01
Alcohol Consequences	.52 [.48, .56]	.58 [.50, .65]	.46 [.36, .55]	.52 [.47, .58]	.08
Adult Problems	.55 [.51, .58]	.46 [.36, .54]	.53 [.43, .61]	.59 [.54, .64]	<.01
Early Alcohol Risk	.84 [.83, .86]	.83 [.80, .87]	.85 [.81, .88]	.85 [.83, .87]	.63
Socioeconomic Status	.90 [.88, .91]	.89 [.86, .92]	.88 [.84, .91]	.90 [.89, .92]	.13
Discriminationc	.73 [.70, .76]	.71 [.63, .77]	.62 [.53, .69]	.58 [.53, .64]	<.01
Depression	.63 [.60, .66]	.55 [.48, .62]	.62 [.55, .69]	.68 [.64, .72]	<.01
AI Cultural Identity	.77 [.75, .79]	.82 [.78, .86]	.73 [.66, .78]	.65 [.60, .69]	<.01
White Cultural Identity	.72 [.69, .75]	.75 [.69, .81]	.69 [.61, .75]	.70 [.65, .74]	.08

Notes: Full sample includes n = 318 students who were missing or other race/ethnicity. AI = American Indian; CI = confidence interval; diff. = differences; DUI: driving under the influence of alcohol.

^aAlcohol availability = perceived alcohol availability;

^bpolice enforcement = perceived police enforcement;

^cdiscrimination = racial discrimination.