TABLE 3.
Immobilized proteina | Protein partnerb | KDc |
---|---|---|
μm | ||
TUM1-Iso1 | NFS1Δ1–55 | 1.63 ± 0.14 |
NFS1Δ1–55·ISD11 | 0.18 ± 0.08 | |
BSA | NDd | |
E. coli IscS | ND | |
TUM1-Iso2 | NFS1Δ1–55 | 1.11 ± 0.21 |
NFS1Δ1–55·ISD11 | 0.26 ± 0.10 | |
BSA | ND | |
E. coli IscS | ND | |
NFS1Δ1–55 | TUM1-Iso1 | 4.06 ± 1.19 |
TUM1-Iso2 | 2.45 ± 0.55 | |
BSA | ND | |
E. coli IscS | ND | |
NFS1Δ1–55·ISD11 | TUM1-Iso1 | 2.92 ± 0.76 |
TUM1-Iso2 | 2.91 ± 1.22 | |
BSA | ND | |
E. coli IscS | ND | |
MOCS3 | TUM1-Iso1 | 3.07 ± 0.08 |
TUM1-Iso2 | 3.58 ± 0.55 | |
BSA | ND | |
E. coli IscS | ND | |
MOCS3-RLD | TUM1-Iso1 | 2.61 ± 0.33 |
TUM1-Iso2 | 3.19 ± 1.8 | |
BSA | ND | |
E. coli IscS | ND |
a Proteins were immobilized via amine coupling.
b Proteins were injected by application of the KINJECT protocol. Concentrations were in the range of 0.3–20 μm. Regeneration of the flow cell was achieved by injection of 20 mm HCl.
c KD values and standard deviations were obtained by global fitting to a 1:1 binding model from at least two independent measurements.
d ND, no binding detectable.