Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 29;92(12):881–893. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.139949

Table 2. Characteristics and main findings of post-licensure oral cholera vaccination campaign studies, 1997–2014.

Vaccine and year of the campaign Site Setting Type and purpose of the vaccination campaign Eligibility criteria Target population Coverage
Main findings
Received 1st dose, no. (%) Received 2nd dose, no. (%)
Dukoral®
1997 Adjumani district, Uganda Refugee camp, rural Pre-emptive vaccination to assess feasibility in a stable refugee camp setting16,17 ≥ 1 year old 44 000 35 613 (81) 27 607 (62) Oral cholera vaccination of a large refugee population is feasible.16 During a cholera epidemic in the area the following year, cholera attack rates were 0.59% in the non-refugee Ugandan villages, 0.04% in the 30 non-vaccinated refugee camps and 0.00% in the six vaccinated refugee camps17
2000 Mayotte Island, Comoros Urban and rural Pre-emptive vaccination campaign to prevent a cholera epidemic18 NA 145 000 NA 93 000 (64) NA
2003–2004 Beira, Mozambique Urban Pre-emptive vaccination in an endemic area with seasonal outbreaks. Effectiveness study in an HIV-endemic sub-Saharan African site20,21 Non-pregnant women, ≥ 2 years old children 19 550 14 164 (72) 11 070 (57) Mass vaccination was feasible but required considerable logistic support and planning.20 One or more doses conferred 78% protection (95% CI: 39–92) against cholera during the year post vaccination21
2004 South Darfur, Sudan Refugee camp, rural Pre-emptive vaccination to assess feasibility during the acute phase of an emergency (i.e. refugee camp of internally displaced persons)22,23 ≥ 2 years old 45 825 42 502 (93) 40 330 (88) Although planning and implementation requirements were significant, the campaign was successful because of the strong support and commitment of the refugee community and collaborators22,23
2005 Aceh, Indonesia Site of internally displaced persons Pre-emptive vaccination to assess feasibility during the acute phase of an emergency (i.e. post-tsunami)23,24 ≥ 2 years old 78 870 62 505 (79) 54 627 (69) Challenges in the coordination, heavy logistics and frequent aftershocks complicated and delayed implementation. Difficulties in maintaining a cold chain resulted in 11.7% vaccine losses23,24
2009 Zanzibar, the United Republic of Tanzania Urban and rural Pre-emptive vaccination in an endemic area with seasonal outbreaks. Effectiveness study to measure direct and indirect protection2628 Non-pregnant women, ≥ 2 years old children 48 178 27 678 (57) 23 921 (50) Confirmed direct vaccine effectiveness of 79% (95% CI: 47–92). First study to show vaccine herd protection in an African setting: 75% (95% CI: 11–93%) indirect protection in the higher coverage group compared with the lower coverage group.26 No evidence of a harmful effect of gestational exposure to the vaccine.27 First use of personal digital assistants for direct data entry during a survey enumeration and mass vaccination28
ORC-Vax and mORC-Vax
1998–2012 Viet Nam Endemic urban and rural areas Pre-emptive and reactive vaccinations of children integrated into the country’s public health programme33 Non-pregnant women, ≥ 1 year old children ≈10.9 million doses NA NA Viet Nam is the only country in the world to regularly use oral cholera vaccinations. Since 1997, the number of cholera cases in Viet Nam has declined, in association with increased vaccination use as well as improvements in socioeconomic and water and sanitation conditions33
1998 and 2000 Hue, Viet Nam Urban and rural Pre-emptive vaccination campaign in a cholera-endemic area. Study to assess long term effectiveness30,31 Non-pregnant women, ≥ 1 year old children 149 557 (1998) and 137 082 (2000) In 1998: 125 135 (84) and in 2000:104 706 (76) In 1998:118 703 (79) and in 2000:103 226 (75) Mass immunization is feasibly administered through the public health system.30 Direct vaccine effectiveness 3 to 5 years after vaccination was 50% (95% CI: 9–63)31
2008 Hanoi, Viet Nam Urban Reactive vaccination campaign during an on-going outbreak32 Non-pregnant women, ≥ 1 year old children ≈370 000 > 10 years old NA ≈80% vaccinated Protective effectiveness of 76% (95% CI: 5–94). First study to document reactive use of oral cholera vaccination during an outbreak32
Shanchol
2011 Odisha, India Rural Pre-emptive vaccination campaign and feasibility study34 Non-pregnant woman, ≥ 1 year old 51 488 31 552 (61) 23 751 (46) Feasible to vaccinate using governmental set-up34
2011 Dhaka, Bangladesh Endemic urban areas Pre-emptive vaccination. Cluster randomized study with three arms: vaccine, vaccine plus safe water and hand washing practice and no intervention35 Non-pregnant women, ≥ 1 year old children 172 754 141 839 (82) 123 666 (72) Feasible to use the national immunization set-up.35 On-going study of vaccine effectiveness
2012 Port-au-Prince, Haiti Urban Reactive vaccination campaign. Pilot study36 ≥ 1 year old children 70 000 52 357 (75) 47 540 (68) Effort, community mobilization and organizational capacity needed for a successful campaign where there were logistical and security challenges36
2012 Bocozel and Grand Saline, Haiti Rural Reactive vaccination campaign. Pilot study3740 ≥ 1 year old children ≈50 000 45 417 41 238 (Estimated 77–79% in Bocozel and 63% in Grand Saline) The campaign integrated with the other components of cholera control was found to be feasible and acceptable3740
2012 Choiseul and Shortland, Solomon Islands Rural Pre-emptive vaccination campaign near an area with a cholera outbreak41 Children 1–14 years old in high-risk areas NA 11 888 11 318 NA
2012 Tak Province, Thailand Refugee camps, rural Pre-emptive vaccination campaign with a knowledge, attitudes and practices survey42 Non-pregnant women, ≥ 1 year old children 43 968 36 325 (83) 26 753 (61) First use of Shanchol™ in a stable refugee camp setting42
2012 Boffa and Forecariah regions, Guinea Rural Reactive vaccination campaign during an on-going outbreak and feasibility study4345 ≥ 1 year old children ≈209 000 (≈163 000 in Boffa and ≈46 000 Forecariah) 172 544 143 706 (Based on administrative population figures, 68% in Boffa and 51% in Forecariah. Household survey immediately after campaign 76%)43 First use of Shanchol™ in sub-Saharan Africa. The campaign was successful despite short preparation time, remote rural setting and highly mobile population.43,44 Protective effectiveness of 87% (95% CI: 56–96)45
2013 Maban county, South Sudan Refugee camps, rural Pre-emptive vaccination campaign in an area with escalating Hep E outbreak46,47 ≥ 1 year old children 146 317 NA 132 000 (> 85% by survey) The campaign was successful despite logistical challenges46,47
2013 Petite Anse and Cerca Carvajal, Haiti Urban and rural Pre-emptive vaccination campaign in a cholera-endemic areaa ≥ 1 year old children > 110 000 113 045 102 250 NA
2014 South Sudan Internally displaced persons camps Pre-emptive vaccination campaign48 Non pregnant women, ≥ 1 year old children 152 000 125 311 (72) 76 088 (awaiting coverage surveys) Humanitarian crisis. First use of global OCV stockpile. Fixed and mobile teams. Second round in one site was co-administered with meningitis vaccine48

CI: confidence interval; Hep E: Hepatitis E; NA: information not available; OCV: oral cholera vaccination.

a Information obtained through personal communications with Kathryn Alberti, UNICEF, New York, USA.