Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):e44–e51. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000010

Table 3.

The odds ratios from the multivariable logistic models fitted to the prevalence of better-ear hearing disability based on Digit Triplet Test performance.

Factor Odds ratio (95% confidence interval)
Insufficient Poor
Age 40–44 - -
45–49 1.2*** (1.1 – 1.3) 1.2 (1.0 – 1.5)
50–54 1.5*** (1.4 – 1.7) 1.5*** (1.2 – 1.8)
55–59 2.2*** (2.0 – 2.4) 2.4*** (1.9 – 2.9)
60–64 3.3*** (3.1 – 3.6) 3.9*** (2.3 – 4.7)
65–69 5.2*** (4.9 – 5.7) 7.5*** (6.2 – 9.0)
Sex Female - -
Male 0.9*** (0.8 – 0.9) 1.0 (0.9–1.1)
Ethnicity White - -
Non-white 3.2*** (3.1 – 3.4) 5.4** (4.9 – 5.9)
Socio-economic status Medium-high socioeconomic status (>−1SD) - -
Low socioeconomic status (<−1SD) 1.5*** (1.4 – 1.6) 2.0*** (1.8 – 2.2)
Work noise exposure No exposure - -
Yes, for more than 5 years 1.5*** (1.4 – 1.6) 2.4*** (2.1 – 2.6)
Yes, for around 1–5 years 1.3*** (1.1 – 1.4) 1.5*** (1.3 – 1.7)
Yes, for less than a year 1.1 (1.0 – 1.1) 1.1 (1.0 – 1.4)
Music noise exposure No exposure - -
Yes, for more than 5 years 1.1* (1.0–1.2) 1.2* (1.0 – 1.4)
Yes, for around 1–5 years 1.0 (1.0 – 1.1) 1.2 (1.0 – 1.4)
Yes, for less than a year 1.0 (0.9 – 1.1) 1.4*** (1.2 – 1.7)
***

p < 0.001

**

p < 0.01

*

p < 0.05

Low socioeconomic status was defined as a Townsend deprivation index score lower than 1 standard deviation (SD) below the mean with reference to the general population of 40 to 69 year-olds; i.e. the most deprived 15% of the population.