Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 Aug;144(8):886–897. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0206

TABLE 2. Baseline characteristics, according to treatment assignment and overall.

CHARACTERISTIC DBA* ONLY,
n (%)
RMGI
LINER, n (%)
OVERALL,
n (%)

Patient-Level Characteristics (n = 339)
Sleep bruxism 48 (28) 46 (27) 94 (28)
Risk of experiencing future caries§
Low 75 (44) 74 (44) 149 (44)
Moderate 62 (36) 70 (42) 132 (39)
High 33 (19) 24 (14) 57 (17)

Tooth-Level Characteristics (n = 346)
Tooth type
Premolar 65 (37) 66 (39) 131 (38)
Molar 111 (63) 104 (61) 215 (62)
Visual presence of crack in pulpal floor
dentin
2 (1) 2 (1) 4 (1)
Gingival index
0: Normal appearance, no bleeding 136 (77) 123 (72) 259 (75)
1: Mild inflammation; slight change in color;
mild edema
32 (18) 42 (25) 74 (21)
2: Moderate inflammation; redness, edema
and glazing; bleeding on probing
8 (5) 5 (3) 13 (4)
3: Severe inflammation; marked redness and
edema; ulceration; spontaneous bleeding
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Class of lesion
I 149 (85) 141 (83) 290 (84)
II 27 (15) 29 (17) 56 (16)
Caries stage
2: Visual change in enamel or cementum 61 (35) 64 (38) 125 (36)
4: Localized enamel breakdown, loss of
cementum, dentin shadow
88 (50) 89 (52) 177 (51)
6: Distinct cavity with visible dentin,
extensive lesion
27 (15) 17 (10) 44 (13)
Radiographic visibility
Visible 80 (45) 81 (48) 161 (47)
Not visible, but confirmed clinically 95 (54) 89 (52) 184 (53)
Not visible 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (0)
Rank of dentin caries activity #
1: Soft, serous 31 (18) 34 (20) 65 (19)
2: Soft, dry 60 (34) 55 (32) 115 (33)
3: Soft, dry, granular 45 (26) 49 (29) 94 (27)
4: Leathery and discolored 19 (11) 14 (8) 33 (10)
5: Firm, but discolored 21 (12) 18 (11) 39 (11)
Extent of caries removal
Complete 169 (96) 164 (96) 333 (96)
Partial 7 (4) 6 (4) 13 (4)
*

DBA: Dentin bonding agent.

RMGI: Resin-modified glass ionomer.

Missing data for one randomly assigned patient who terminated her involvement in the study before receiving treatment.

§

No definitions as to risk of future caries were provided to the practitioner-investigators.

Missing data for three randomly assigned participants who terminated their involvement in the study during the baseline visit.

#

According to scale described by Lehmann and colleagues.18