TABLE 2. Baseline characteristics, according to treatment assignment and overall.
CHARACTERISTIC | DBA* ONLY, n (%) |
RMGI† LINER, n (%) |
OVERALL, n (%) |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Patient-Level Characteristics (n = 339) ‡ | |||
Sleep bruxism | 48 (28) | 46 (27) | 94 (28) |
Risk of experiencing future caries§ | |||
Low | 75 (44) | 74 (44) | 149 (44) |
Moderate | 62 (36) | 70 (42) | 132 (39) |
High | 33 (19) | 24 (14) | 57 (17) |
| |||
Tooth-Level Characteristics (n = 346) ¶ | |||
Tooth type | |||
Premolar | 65 (37) | 66 (39) | 131 (38) |
Molar | 111 (63) | 104 (61) | 215 (62) |
Visual presence of crack in pulpal floor
dentin |
2 (1) | 2 (1) | 4 (1) |
Gingival index | |||
0: Normal appearance, no bleeding | 136 (77) | 123 (72) | 259 (75) |
1: Mild inflammation; slight change in color; mild edema |
32 (18) | 42 (25) | 74 (21) |
2: Moderate inflammation; redness, edema and glazing; bleeding on probing |
8 (5) | 5 (3) | 13 (4) |
3: Severe inflammation; marked redness and edema; ulceration; spontaneous bleeding |
0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Class of lesion | |||
I | 149 (85) | 141 (83) | 290 (84) |
II | 27 (15) | 29 (17) | 56 (16) |
Caries stage | |||
2: Visual change in enamel or cementum | 61 (35) | 64 (38) | 125 (36) |
4: Localized enamel breakdown, loss of cementum, dentin shadow |
88 (50) | 89 (52) | 177 (51) |
6: Distinct cavity with visible dentin, extensive lesion |
27 (15) | 17 (10) | 44 (13) |
Radiographic visibility | |||
Visible | 80 (45) | 81 (48) | 161 (47) |
Not visible, but confirmed clinically | 95 (54) | 89 (52) | 184 (53) |
Not visible | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | 1 (0) |
Rank of dentin caries activity # | |||
1: Soft, serous | 31 (18) | 34 (20) | 65 (19) |
2: Soft, dry | 60 (34) | 55 (32) | 115 (33) |
3: Soft, dry, granular | 45 (26) | 49 (29) | 94 (27) |
4: Leathery and discolored | 19 (11) | 14 (8) | 33 (10) |
5: Firm, but discolored | 21 (12) | 18 (11) | 39 (11) |
Extent of caries removal | |||
Complete | 169 (96) | 164 (96) | 333 (96) |
Partial | 7 (4) | 6 (4) | 13 (4) |
DBA: Dentin bonding agent.
RMGI: Resin-modified glass ionomer.
Missing data for one randomly assigned patient who terminated her involvement in the study before receiving treatment.
No definitions as to risk of future caries were provided to the practitioner-investigators.
Missing data for three randomly assigned participants who terminated their involvement in the study during the baseline visit.
According to scale described by Lehmann and colleagues.18