Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Violence. 2014 Oct;4(4):445–461. doi: 10.1037/a0037494

Table 4.

Convergent Validity of Sexual Assault Severity Scales for Women: Correlations

Scoring methods Relationship
Abuse
Relationship
Violence
Somatization Depression Anxiety PTSD Intrusive
Experiences
Conventional severity ranking scheme
  Highest severity rank .29*** .31*** .21*** .13** .14** .24***
  Sum of ranks .30*** .34*** .25*** .16** .18*** .29***
  Sum of frequency of ranks .34*** .39***1 .25*** .17*** .21*** .31***
Combined outcomes separated tactics severity ranking scheme
  Highest severity rank .35*** .34*** .20** .14** .15** .28***
  Sum of ranks .37***1 .38*** .21*** .15** .17*** .30***
  Sum of frequency of ranks .37***1 .40***1 .23*** .15** .19*** .30***
Separated outcomes and tactics severity ranking scheme
  Highest severity rank .34*** .35*** .21*** .13** .15** .27***
  Sum of ranks .35*** .37*** .25*** .16** .19*** .29***
  Sum of frequency of ranks .37***1 .39***1 .25*** .16** .21*** .30***
M = 18.4 SD = 12.0 M = 1.4 SD = 0.5 M = 1.3 SD = 0.4 M = 1.9 SD = 0.8 M = 1.6 SD = 0.6 M = 1.6 SD = 0.5

Note. M = mean; SD = standard deviation. Correlations were conducted using Spearman’s Rank Order Correlation.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.

1

Comparisons of correlation differences significant at p < .05.