Table 2.
Methodologic Assessment for All Included Studies
| Study |
Critical Appraisal Skills Program Score: Methodologic Assessment |
| Ichiba and Kishimoto,12 2009 | 9: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way, outcome not accurately measured to minimize bias, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Ferretti et al,26 1991 | 8: Exposure not accurately measured to minimize bias, confounding factors not identified, results cannot be applied to general population, results do not fit with other available evidence |
| Sajovic et al,52 2006 | 11: Results cannot be applied to general population |
| Keays et al,45 2007 | 8: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way, outcome not accurately measured to reduce bias, results are not precise, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Liden et al,30 2008 | 8: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way, exposure not accurately measured to minimize bias, confounding factors not identified, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Ahlden et al,39 2009 | 9: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way, confounding factors not identified, confounding factors not accounted for |
| Roe et al,50 2005 | 10: Results cannot be applied to general population, confounding factors not identified |
| Hart et al,27 2005 | 8: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way, confounding factors not identified, results cannot be applied to general population, results do not fit with other evidence |
| Mueffels et al,40 2009 | 9: Confounding factors not identified, cohort not recruited in acceptable way, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Holm et al,43 2010 | 9: Confounding factors not identified, cohort not recruited in acceptable way, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Sutherland et al,38 2010 | 10: Confounding factors not accounted for, results not applied to general population |
| Hoffelner et al,42 2012 | 9: Confounding factors not identified, cohort not recruited in acceptable way, results cannot be applied to general population |
| van der Hart et al,49 2008 | 11: Confounding factors not accounted for |
| Hertel et al,41 2005 | 9: Confounding factors not identified, cohort not recruited in acceptable way, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Seon et al,33 2006 | 9: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way, confounding factors not identified, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Kessler et al,11 2008 | 8: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way (ie, body mass index), no blinding, confounding factors not identified, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Lebel et al,32 2008 | 7: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way, confounding factors not identified, results not precise, results not believable, results do not fit with other evidence |
| Sajovic et al,51 2011 | 11: Results cannot be applied to general population |
| Cohen et al,15 2007 | 9: No control comparison, no definite data to support conclusions, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Segawa et al,13 2001 | 9: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way, confounding factors not identified, high dropout rate |
| Lohmander et al,14 2004 | 10: Exposure not accurately measured, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Oiestad et al,34 2011 | 10: Confounding factors not accounted for, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Murray et al,53 2012 | 9: Confounding factors not identified, cohort not recruited in acceptable way, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Salmon et al,47 2006 | 11: Confounding factors not accounted for |
| Struewer et al,6 2012 | 10: Confounding factors not accounted for, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Meunier et al,16 2007 | 8: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way, outcome not accurately measured to minimize bias, confounding factors not accounted for |
| Neuman et al,17 2008 | 9: Results are not precise, cannot be applied to general population, results are not believable |
| Oiestad et al,35 2010 | 11: Confounding factors not accounted for |
| Oiestad et al,36 2010 | 10: Confounding factors not accounted for, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Hui et al,44 2011 | 9: Confounding factors not identified, cohort not recruited in acceptable way, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Streich et al,28 2011 | 10: Results are not precise, cannot be applied to general population |
| Bourke et al,37 2012 | 11: Confounding factors not accounted for |
| Drogset et al,46 2006 | 10: Results do not fit with other available evidence, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Selmi et al,31 2006 | 10: Confounding factors not identified, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Mihelic et al,29 2011 | 7: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way, confounding factors not identified, results not precise, results not believable |
| Ventura et al,21 2010 | 9: Confounding factors not identified, outcome not accurately measured to reduce bias, results cannot be applied to general population |
| Strand et al,48 2005 | 9: Results do not fit with other available evidence, results cannot be applied to general population, confounding factors not accounted for |
| Nebelung et al,22 2005 | 7: Cohort not recruited in acceptable way, outcome was not measured correctly to minimize bias, confounding factors not identified, results cannot be applied to general population, results do not fit with other evidence |