Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 19;4(23):4505–4521. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1270

Table 3.

Genotypic correlations within (a) and between (b) treatments

δ 13C δ 13C Plasticity Flowering date Biomass Absolute fitness
(a) Between traits, within treatment
δ 13C 0.37***
(−0.51, −0.24)
L 0.59***
(0.50, 0.71)
L 0.07
(−0.05, 0.21)
L 0.43***
(−0.57, −0.31)
L
δ 13C plasticity 0.61***
(0.51, 0.73)
D 0.06
(−0.10, 0.21)
L 0.03
(−0.10, 0.15)
L 0.03
(−0.13, 0.19)
L
 Flowering date 0.57***
(0.47, 0.68)
D 0.14*
(−0.04, 0.32)
D −0.06
(−0.18, 0.05)
L 0.64***
(−0.72, −0.56)
L
 Biomass 0.01
(−0.13, 0.16)
D 0.05
(−0.09, 0.18)
D 0.32***
(−0.41, −0.24)
D 0.59***
(0.50, 0.69)
L
 Absolute fitness 0.47***
(−0.59, −0.37)
D −0.07
(−0.23, 0.08)
D 0.79***
(−0.83, −0.74)
D 0.57***
(0.48, 0.67)
D
r 95% CI
(b) Same trait, between treatments
δ 13C versus δ 13C 0.51*** (0.41, 0.62)
 Biomass versus Biomass 0.75*** (0.67, 0.87)
 Absolute fitness versus Absolute fitness 0.70*** (0.64, 0.76)

Values above and below the diagonal in (a) represent correlations within the long season (L) and drought (D) treatments, respectively. N  = 206–234. Values are Pearson's product–moment correlation coefficients. Values in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals.

Significant values are in bold.

***

P  < 0.0001;

*

P  ≤ 0.05.