Table 1.
Examples of drugs well suited for Tier B versus C development
| Attribute | Tier B | Tier C |
|---|---|---|
| Example spectrum | Broad with MDR pathogen coverage | Narrow MDR pathogen coverage |
| Example target pathogen | MDR Enterobacteriaceae (also covers if non-MDR) | Pseudomonas aeruginosa only |
| Challenge in studying the MDR pathogen in large numbers? | Yes | Yes |
| Detailed insight into: | ||
| Microbiology including mechanism of action and resistance? | Yes | Yes |
| Animal models that mimic human disease? | Yes | Yes |
| Exposure response in animals? | Yes | Yes |
| Detailed PK–PD justification of dose selection in humansa | Yes | Yes |
| Can do “standard” P3 study versus susceptible organisms? | Yesb | No |
| Randomized comparative data generated? | Yes (single body site, vs. standard comparator) | Yes (multiple body sites, vs. BATc) |
| Able to do “usual strength” statistical inference testing? | Yes, but only in the standard P3 study | No |
| Pooling of data across infection sites proposed? | Yes | Yes |
| Reliance on a totality-of-evidence approach?d | High | Even higher |
MDR, multidrug resistant.
The mechanism of action is understood, animal models are available that reasonably mimic human disease at relevant sites, an exposure–response relationship in the animal studies informs human dose with an adequate safety margin, and PK is known in healthy volunteers and relevant patient groups.
This provides relevant efficacy data if MDR pathogens have same susceptibility to a new agent as do non-MDR pathogens.
BAT, best available therapy, standardized insofar as possible.
All drug reviews consider the totality of evidence, but the reliance on such things as PK–PD predictions and pooled responses across sites will be very high here.