Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychosom Res. 2014 Jul 14;77(3):205–212. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.07.006

Table 3.

Gender differences in pain, tiredness, stress, and sadness based on traditional average scores and based on two-part models

Traditional model Two-part model


Composite score Frequency Intensity Difference




Mean ES (SE) Mean
%
ES (SE) Mean ES (SE) ES (SE)
Pain
  Men 0.83 -- 29.8 -- 1.88 -- --
  Women 0.96 +.09 (.02)* 29.6 −.01 (.03) 2.21 +.22 (.04)* +.22 (.04)*
Tired
  Men 2.07 -- 67.0 -- 2.90 -- --
  Women 2.42 +.25 (.03)* 70.4 +.10 (.03) 3.28 +.36 (.03)* +.26 (.04)*
Stress
  Men 1.27 -- 46.8 -- 2.32 -- --
  Women 1.43 +.13 (.03)* 46.9 +.00 (.03) 2.67 +.30 (.04)* +.30 (.04)*
Sad
  Men 0.59 -- 23.0 -- 1.98 -- --
  Women 0.66 +.07 (.03) 22.6 −.02 (.03) 2.30 +.25 (.04)* +.26 (.05)*

Note:

*

p < .001.

Effect sizes (ES) represent the standardized group difference calculated as the difference in means relative to the latent factor variance of each measure; SE = standard error.Sample sizes are n = 5,634 women and n = 7,195 men.