Table 3.
Approaches to analysis
| Results reported | Canivano and Gracia [10] | HTA report [8] | Li et al. [15] | Krasopoulos et al. [11] | Pusch et al. [12] | Snoep et al. [13] | Sofi et al. [14] | Wisman et al. [16] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Narrative/results tabulated only | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Tabulated by PFT | ✓ | |||||||
| Forest plot (no pooling) | ✓ | |||||||
| Meta-analysis (fixed effect) | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Meta-analysis (random effects) | ✓ (As sensitivity analysis) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Pooled RR | ✓ (As sensitivity analysis) | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Pooled OR | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| HRs reported | ✓ (Not pooled) | |||||||
| Meta-analysis by PFT | ✓ (For some) | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Meta-analysis by outcome | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| Meta-analysis by mono- or dual therapy | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Meta-analysis by duration of follow-up | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Meta-analysis by aspirin dose | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
| Meta-analysis by population | ✓ | ✓ | ||||||
| Sensitivity analysis (quality) | ✓ | |||||||
| Results by different thresholds presented | ✓ | |||||||
| Adjusted/unadjusted results presented | ✓ |