Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 14;20(46):17468–17475. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17468

Table 2.

Follow-up results in 33 patients with pancreas divisum and previous and recent recurrent acute pancreatitisaccording to dilatation or non-dilatation of the main pancreatic duct detected at the time of the enrollment into the study n (%)

Dorsal duct AP recurrences EUS signs of CP
Previous RAP (14 pts) Dilated (6 pts) 0 4 (66.7)1
Non-dilated (8 pts) 0 5 (62.5)
Total 0b 9 (64.3)2
Recent RAP (19 pts) Dilated (11 pts) 2 (18.2)3 7 (63.6)3
Non-dilated (8 pts) 3 (37.5) 4 (50.0)
Total 5 (26.3) 11 (57.9)4
1

Dilated and non-dilated in the previous RAP group: P = NS;

2

Previous and recent RAP: P = NS;

b

P < 0.05, endotherapy vs main pancreatic duct dilatation;

3

Dilated and non-dilated in the recent RAP group: P = NS;

4

All five patients with AP recurrences during follow-up developed CP. AP: Acute pancreatitis; EUS: Endoscopic ultrasonography; CP: Chronic pancreatitis; RAP: Recurrent acute pancreatitis; NS: Not significant.