Table 4.
Summary of quantitative course evaluation for 23 participants following the training intervention on a 5-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 5: strongly agree)
| Course evaluation | Statement | Mean ± SD |
| Content | Improved my understanding of patient safety, human factors and the systems approach to error | 3.95 ± 0.72 |
| Improved my understanding of how to analyse an adverse event and learn from error | 4.14 ± 0.77 | |
| Improved my understanding of solutions to prevent error | 4.18 ± 0.66 | |
| Enhanced my understanding of non-technical skills | 4.32 ± 0.57 | |
| Will enable me to use the Endoscopic Non-Technical Skills framework to reflect upon patient safety issues | 4.23 ± 0.53 | |
| Provided me with a set of strategies to enhance safety in the endoscopy suite | 4.09 ± 0.43 | |
| Implementation | Will change my practice in endoscopy to enhance patient safety | 4.14 ± 0.83 |
| The learning objectives were met and the take-home message was clear | 4.32 ± 0.57 | |
| Teaching and learning materials were of an appropriate quality | 4.27 ± 0.55 | |
| This course should be mandatory for all members of the Bowel Cancer Screening team | 3.91 ± 1.11 | |
| This course should be offered to non-Bowel Cancer Screening endoscopy teams | 4.36 ± 0.79 | |
| Satisfaction | This course was well delivered and engaging | 4.23 ± 0.53 |
| Overall, I was satisfied with the course | 4.18 ± 0.73 | |
| I would recommend this course to a colleague | 4.18 ± 0.80 |