Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Parasitology. 2014 Jun 16;141(14):1841–1855. doi: 10.1017/S0031182014000626

Table 3.

Quality control and lower limit of detection levels of the different UCP-LF CAA assay formats

Assay name CAA antigen assay Biological matrixa Dry/wet formatb Single test QC (CAA pg/mL)c Triplicate LLOD (CAA pg/mL)d
SCAA20 serum wet 10 5
SCAA500 serum wet 1 0·5
SCAA4000 serum wet 0-3 0·15
SCAA20 serum dry 30 15
SCAA500 serum dry 3 1·5
SCAA4000 serum dry 1 0·5
UCAA10 urine wet 10 5
UCAA250 urine wet 1 0·5
UCAA2000 urine wet 0-1 0·05
UCAA7500 urine wet 0-03 0·015
UCAA10 urine dry 30 15
UCAA250 urine dry 3 1·5
UCAA2000 urine dry 0-3 0·15
UCAA7500 urine dry 0-1 0·05
a

Results achieved in the saliva-based matrix are not included. The saliva-based assay is not fully explored and determined levels are still considered tentative; clinical saliva-based samples from Schistosoma infected individuals were not yet tested.

b

The dry assay format is developed for use by third parties (allows convenient transport of dry reagents without a cold chain). The wet assay format is used at LUMC to achieve maximum sensitivity.

c

The QC (quality control) values present the detection values that need to be achieved when testing normal human sera or urine spiked with AWA-TCA (containing 3% w/w CAA). The CAA-20 level is the most stringent; UCP conjugates that do not pass the CAA-20 QC will not be used for preparation of dry reagents.

d

The LLOD (lower limit of detection) is the level achievable when testing under ideal laboratory conditions or when performing multiple (triplicate or more) experiments.