Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan;105(1):77–84. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301871

TABLE 2—

Results of Multivariable Model of Dental Care Use in the Preceding 6 Months: Project SMILE, Florida, 2005–2009

Variable Adjusted OR (95% CI) P
Intervention effect: treatment vs control group
 6 mo 2.52 (1.56, 4.08) <.001
 12 mo 1.98 (1.17, 3.35) .011
 18 mo 1.07 (0.62, 1.86) .797
Intervention effect over time
 12 mo vs 6 mo 0.82 (0.52, 1.31) .411
 18 mo vs 12 mo 0.59 (0.35, 1.01) .053
 18 mo vs 6 mo 0.49 (0.29, 0.82) .007
Age, y 1.01 (0.99, 1.03) .168
Gender 0.95 (0.67, 1.35) .776
Race/ethnicity
 Hispanic vs non-Hispanic White/other 0.90 (0.51, 1.57) .7
 Non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White/other 0.64 (0.38, 1.09) .101
Education
 < high school vs > high school 0.93 (0.59, 1.44) .731
 High school vs > high school 0.75 (0.51, 1.10) .14
On-site dental care 1.41 (0.95, 2.09) .084
≥ 2 medical care visits in past 6 mo 2.12 (1.40, 3.24) <.001
Referred to dentist by any health care provider 6.80 (4.98, 9.30) <.001
Importance of oral health for people with HIV 1.40 (1.02, 1.92) .038
Better informed than other HIV-positive people 2.74 (1.54, 4.87) <.001
General satisfaction with dental care 2.40 (1.51, 3.80) <.001
High self-efficacy 1.44 (1.03, 2.03) .035

Note. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio. Data were derived from a generalized estimating equations analysis (n = 1200 observations).