TABLE 1—
Number and Percentage of Youths Possessing Assets and Mean Successful Transition to Early Adulthood Outcome by Number of Assets Within Each Asset Level: Youth Asset Study; Oklahoma City, OK, Metro Area; 2003–2008
Youth Assets | No. (%) | STEA Outcome, Mean (SD) | ANOVA (Jonckheere–Terpstra) |
Individual-level assets | |||
0–2 | 121 (19) | 14.8 (2.5) | < 0.0001 (< 0.0001) |
3 | 235 (36) | 15.3 (2.2) | |
4 | 295 (45) | 16.0 (2.3) | |
Family-level assets | 0.0049 (0.0067) | ||
0–1 | 112 (17) | 15.1 (2.4) | |
2 | 139 (21) | 15.3 (2.4) | |
3 | 225 (35) | 15.6 (2.4) | |
4 | 175 (27) | 15.8 (2.2) | |
Community-level assets | < 0.0001 (< 0.0001) | ||
0–1 | 112 (17) | 14.9 (2.6) | |
2 | 121 (19) | 15.1 (2.4) | |
3 | 169 (26) | 15.4 (2.2) | |
4 | 133 (20) | 15.9 (2.3) | |
5–6 | 116 (18) | 16.3 (2.0) |
Note. ANOVA = analysis of variance; STEA = successful transition to early adulthood. The sample size was n = 651.