TABLE 2—

Linear Regression Analyses of Assets on Successful Transition to Early Adulthood by Asset Group: Youth Asset Study; Oklahoma City, OK, Metro Area; 2003–2008

Assets	b (95% CI)
Individual-level assetsa
0–2 vs 3 assets	0.53* (0.01, 1.04)
0–2 vs 4 assets	1.17* (0.66, 1.67)
Family-level assets
Malesb
0–1 vs 2 assets	0.72 (–0.18, 1.63)
0–1 vs 3 assets	1.29* (0.47, 2.12)
0–1 vs 4 assets	1.68* (0.80, 2.56)
Females,b Non-Hispanic White
0–1 vs 2 assets	1.42* (0.05, 2.80)
0–1 vs 3 assets	0.25 (–0.92, 1.42)
0–1 vs 4 assets	0.67 (–0.55, 1.88)
Females,b Non-Hispanic Black
0–1 vs 2 assets	–1.12 (–2.50, 0.26)
0–1 vs 3 assets	0.41 (–0.88, 1.70)
0–1 vs 4 assets	0.79 (–0.77, 2.35)
Females,b Non-Hispanic other
0–1 vs 2 assets	–0.32 (–2.64, 2.00)
0–1 vs 3 assets	–0.46 (–2.86, 1.94)
0–1 vs 4 assets	–2.33 (–4.91, 0.25)
Females,b Hispanic
0–1 vs 2 assets	–0.85 (–2.25, 0.54)
0–1 vs 3 assets	–0.94 (–2.29, 0.42)
0–1 vs 4 assets	–0.79 (–2.17, 0.59)
Community-level assetsa
Aged 18–19 y
0–1 vs 2 assets	–0.11 (–0.91, 0.68)
0–1 vs 3 assets	–0.06 (–0.79, 0.68)
0–1 vs 4 assets	0.27 (–0.49, 1.04)
0–1 vs 5–6 assets	0.99* (0.19, 1.79)
Aged 20–22 y
0–1 vs 2 assets	0.49 (–0.40, 1.39)
0–1 vs 3 assets	1.28* (0.45, 2.12)
0–1 vs 4 assets	2.22* (1.29, 3.15)
0–1 vs 5–6 assets	2.22* (1.27, 3.18)

Note. CI = confidence interval; STEA = successful transition to early adulthood. The sample size was n = 651.

^aAdjusted for youth age, race/ethnicity, and gender; parental education; family structure; and school enrollment.

^bAdjusted for youth age and race/ethnicity, parental education, family structure, and school enrollment.

*P < .05.