Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 15;5:693. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00693

Table 1.

Percent of M. maripaludis and D. vulgaris cells in planktonic and biofilm phases over time [row 1 early (0 h), 2 intermediate (48 h), 3 steady-state (240 h)] in a reactor containing both growth phases, a reactor where biofilm has been removed (row 4), a reactor with an increased loading rate (row 5), and a reactor containing a coculture of ΔpilA mutant D. vulgaris with wild-type M. maripaludis (row 6).

Rows % M. maripaludis biofilm % D. vulgaris biofilm % M. maripaludis planktonic % D. vulgaris planktonic
1 Biofilm and planktonic early 3% ± 0.8 97% ± 0.8 26% ± 13.7 69% ± 11.1
2 Biofilm and planktonic intermediate 22% ± 1.5 78% ± 1.5 23% ± 12.1 73% ± 10.6
3 Biofilm and planktonic steady state 31% ± 1.4 69% ±1.4 36% ±10.8 59% ±2.2
4 WT planktonic only 0 0 13% ± 1.9 82% ± 1.9
5 Biofilm and planktonic increased loading rate 18% ± 1.5 82% ± 1.5 22% ± 5.9 73% ± 3.3
6 ΔpilA planktonic only 0 0 19% ± 1.4 81% ± 1.4

Error is the 95% confidence interval. The number of images analyzed for each time point is early n = 146, intermediate n = 269, steady-state n = 2,118, biofilm removed n = 140, increased loading rate n = 174, and ΔpilA n = 120.