Table 1.
Characteristic | Mean(SD)a | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Month 12 | P Value | Month 24 | P Value | Month 36 | P Value | |
Total No. of patients | 44 | 40 | 31 | 18 | |||
Visual acuity, ETDRS score | 14.9 (18.3) | 14.4 (19.3) | .65 | 14.1 (17.3) | .57 | 15.9 (19.6) | .20 |
Visual field, mean deviation | −24.4 (8.9) | −25.5 (6.6) | .33 | −24.9 (7.1) | .82 | −23.9 (7.0) | .23 |
RNFL thickness on OCT, µm | 66.2 (23.9) | 55.7 (5.9) | .006 | 55.3 (4.7) | .03 | 54.8 (4.3) | .23 |
PERG amplitude, % of normal | 40.3 (18.3) | 38.8 (19.2) | .99 | 42.2 (24.7) | .59 | 33.3 (13.5) | .13 |
PERG phase, % of normal | 106.2 (7.2) | 106.6 (8.0) | .64 | 107.2 (9.4) | .66 | 103.5 (9.1) | .07 |
No. of patients with onset ≤12 mo | 13 | 12 | 9 | 4 | |||
Visual acuity, ETDRS score | 23.3 (21.4) | 23.2 (28.3) | .78 | 18.6 (24.6) | .93 | 21.9 (28.4) | .41 |
Visual field, mean deviation | −20.6 (10.1) | −24.1 (7.9) | .33 | −24.6 (6.0) | .79 | −22.9 (5.1) | .26 |
RNFL thickness on OCT, µm | 93.7 (24.2) | 60.3 (4.6) | .001 | 57.9 (4.8) | .003 | 56.9 (3.9) | .06 |
PERG amplitude, % of normal | 41.3 (17.0) | 37.9 (16.6) | .98 | 37.8 (21.8) | .72 | 32.8 (18.3) | .79 |
PERG phase, % of normal | 105.5 (5.4) | 105.4 (5.2) | .67 | 106.2 (8.0) | .99 | 109.1 (7.5) | .32 |
No. of patients with onset >12 mo | 31 | 28 | 22 | 14 | |||
Visual acuity, ETDRS score | 11.3 (15.9) | 10.6 (12.7) | .35 | 12.2 (13.5) | .17 | 14.1 (17.4) | .18 |
Visual field, mean deviation | −26.0 (7.9) | −26.2 (6.0) | .83 | −25 (7.6) | .99 | −24.3 (7.6) | .62 |
RNFL thickness on OCT, µm | 53.9 (8.8) | 53.6 (5.3) | .52 | 54.1 (4.3) | .25 | 54.1 (4.4) | .07 |
PERG amplitude, % of normal | 39.9 (19.1) | 39.2 (20.5) | .99 | 43.8 (26.1) | .36 | 33.4 (12.7) | .11 |
PERG phase, % of normal | 106.5 (7.9) | 107.2 (9.1) | .84 | 107.6 (10.1) | .58 | 101.9 (9.1) | .02 |
Abbreviations: ETDRS, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PERG, pattern electroretinogram; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer
Data are based on the number of eyes evaluated. P values were determined for comparison of each follow-up visit with baseline by paired t test.