Skip to main content
. 2014 Nov 12;101(1):164–172. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.087551

TABLE 2.

Prospective associations of rice consumption with cardiovascular disease among adults in the NHS, NHSII, and HPFS1

Rice intake, servings/wk
<1 1 2–4 ≥5 Every 3 servings/wk P-trend
Cardiovascular disease
 White rice
  No. at risk 125,905 56,473 21,648 3530
  Cases/person-years 6175/1,979,490 3735/1,434,839 2261/878,523 220/100,278
  Model 12 1.00 0.97 (0.93, 1.01) 0.96 (0.91, 1.01) 0.84 (0.73, 0.96) 0.94 (0.89, 0.98) 0.01
  Model 23 1.00 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) 1.00 (0.95, 1.05) 0.95 (0.82, 1.11) 0.99 (0.94, 1.05) 0.78
  Model 34 1.00 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) 1.02 (0.97, 1.07) 0.98 (0.84, 1.14) 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) 0.69
 Brown rice
  No. at risk 176,888 21,866 7610 1192
  Cases/person-years 10,159/3,483,943 1436/582,370 727/296,734 69/30,083
  Model 12 1.00 0.89 (0.84, 0.94) 0.85 (0.79, 0.92) 0.77 (0.61, 0.98) 0.82 (0.76, 0.88) <0.001
  Model 23 1.00 0.96 (0.91, 1.02) 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 0.86 (0.68, 1.10) 0.94 (0.87, 1.01) 0.10
  Model 34 1.00 1.01 (0.95, 1.07) 1.05 (0.97, 1.13) 1.01 (0.79, 1.28) 1.04 (0.96, 1.13) 0.32
 Total rice
  No. at risk 88,619 61,433 41,849 15,655
  Cases/person-years 4104/1,222,338 3924/1,401,634 3738/1,467,592 625/301,565
  Model 12 1.00 0.91 (0.87, 0.95) 0.87 (0.83, 0.91) 0.80 (0.73, 0.87) 0.88 (0.84, 0.91) <0.001
  Model 23 1.00 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) 0.97 (0.92, 1.01) 0.92 (0.84, 1.00) 0.96 (0.92, 1.00) 0.06
  Model 34 1.00 1.00 (0.95, 1.04) 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) 0.99 (0.90, 1.08) 1.00 (0.96, 1.05) 0.86
Coronary artery disease
 White rice
  No. at risk 125,905 56,473 21,648 3530
  Cases/person-years 3848/1,979,490 2328/1,434,839 1417/878,523 126/100,278
  Model 12 1.00 0.99 (0.94, 1.04) 0.98 (0.92, 1.04) 0.74 (0.62, 0.89) 0.93 (0.87, 0.98) 0.01
  Model 23 1.00 1.03 (0.98, 1.09) 1.03 (0.96, 1.09) 0.81 (0.66, 0.99) 0.98 (0.92, 1.05) 0.61
  Model 34 1.00 1.04 (0.98, 1.09) 1.05 (0.98, 1.12) 0.84 (0.69, 1.02) 1.01 (0.94, 1.07) 0.87
 Brown rice
  No. at risk 176,888 21,866 7610 1192
  Cases/person-years 6328/3,483,943 899/582,370 457/296,734 35/30,083
  Model 12 1.00 0.86 (0.80, 0.92) 0.83 (0.75, 0.91) 0.59 (0.42, 0.82) 0.76 (0.69, 0.84) <0.001
  Model 23 1.00 0.94 (0.87, 1.01) 0.95 (0.86, 1.04) 0.66 (0.47, 0.92) 0.88 (0.80, 0.97) 0.01
  Model 34 1.00 0.99 (0.92, 1.06) 1.05 (0.95, 1.16) 0.80 (0.57, 1.12) 1.00 (0.91, 1.11) 0.95
 Total rice
  No. at risk 88,619 61,433 41,849 15,655
  Cases/person-years 2547/1,222,338 2467/1,401,634 2309/1,467,592 396/301,565
  Model 12 1.00 0.93 (0.88, 0.99) 0.86 (0.81, 0.91) 0.76 (0.69, 0.85) 0.86 (0.81, 0.90) <0.001
  Model 23 1.00 1.01 (0.96, 1.07) 0.98 (0.92, 1.04) 0.88 (0.78, 0.98) 0.94 (0.90, 0.99) 0.03
  Model 34 1.00 1.03 (0.98, 1.09) 1.03 (0.97, 1.09) 0.97 (0.86, 1.08) 0.99 (0.94, 1.05) 0.81
Stroke
 White rice
  No. at risk 125,905 56,473 21,648 3530
  Cases/person-years 2327/1,979,490 1407/1,434,839 844/878,523 94/100,278
  Model 12 1.00 0.94 (0.88, 1.01) 0.93 (0.86, 1.01) 1.02 (0.83, 1.26) 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 0.31
  Model 23 1.00 0.97 (0.90, 1.03) 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 1.23 (0.97, 1.55) 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) 0.85
  Model 34 1.00 0.97 (0.90, 1.03) 0.97 (0.89, 1.05) 1.25 (0.99, 1.57) 1.02 (0.94, 1.11) 0.67
 Brown rice
  No. at risk 176,888 21,866 7610 1192
  Cases/person-years 3831/3,483,943 537/582,370 270/296,734 34/30,083
  Model 12 1.00 0.94 (0.86, 1.03) 0.89 (0.79, 1.01) 1.14 (0.81, 1.59) 0.92 (0.82, 1.04) 0.20
  Model 23 1.00 1.00 (0.91, 1.10) 0.99 (0.87, 1.12) 1.28 (0.91, 1.80) 1.04 (0.92, 1.17) 0.58
  Model 34 1.00 1.03 (0.94, 1.14) 1.05 (0.92, 1.19) 1.39 (0.99, 1.96) 1.11 (0.98, 1.26) 0.12
 Total rice
  No. at risk 88,619 61,433 41,849 15,655
  Cases/person-years 1557/1,222,338 1457/1,401,634 1429/1,467,592 229/301,565
  Model 12 1.00 0.88 (0.82, 0.94) 0.88 (0.81, 0.94) 0.86 (0.75, 0.99) 0.92 (0.86, 0.98) 0.01
  Model 23 1.00 0.93 (0.86, 1.00) 0.95 (0.88, 1.03) 0.99 (0.86, 1.15) 0.99 (0.93, 1.06) 0.83
  Model 34 1.00 0.94 (0.87, 1.01) 0.98 (0.91, 1.06) 1.04 (0.89, 1.21) 1.02 (0.95, 1.10) 0.55
1

HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study; NHS, Nurses’ Health Study; NHSII, Nurses’ Health Study II.

2

HRs (95% CIs) in model 1 were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression stratifying jointly by age (y), sex (male or female), and cohorts (NHS, NHSII, or HPFS).

3

HRs (95% CIs) in model 2 were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression further adjusting for ethnicity (white, Asian, African American, and Hispanic/other), BMI (in kg/m2; <23.0, 23.0–24.9, 25.0–29.9, 30.0–34.9, or ≥35.0), smoking status [never smoked, past smoker, or currently smoke (1–14 or ≥15 cigarettes/d)], alcohol intake (0, 0.1–4.9, 5.0–9.9, 10.0–14.9, 15.0–29.9, or ≥30.0 g/d), physical activity (<3.0, 3.0–8.9, 9.0–17.9, 18.0–26.9, or ≥27.0 metabolic equivalent tasks × hours/wk), family history of myocardial infarction (yes or no), menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone use [premenopause, postmenopause (never, past, or current hormone use), for women], oral contraceptive use (never, past, or current use, for NHSII only), multivitamin use (yes or no), current aspirin use (yes or no), prevalent hypertension (yes or no), prevalent hypercholesterolemia (yes or no), prevalent diabetes (yes or no), and total energy intake (kcal/d).

4

HRs (95% CIs) in model 3 were estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression further adjusting for modified alternate Healthy Eating Index score (quintiles) as a summary measure of diet quality.