TABLE 6.
Intercorrelations among Compensatory Strategies for Ethical Decision Making, Computer-Assisted Scoring System
| M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Attending to Scientific Principles | 0.15 | 0.39 | ||||||||||||||
| 2. Complexity Evaluation | 0.68 | 0.63 | .10 | |||||||||||||
| 3. Contingency Planning | 1.40 | 0.79 | –.01 | .51** | ||||||||||||
| 4. Deliberative Action | 1.38 | 1.31 | –.05 | .31** | .57** | |||||||||||
| 5. Following Appropriate Role Models | 1.48 | 1.98 | –.05 | .31** | .30* | .11 | ||||||||||
| 6. Maintaining Objective Focus | 0.67 | 0.94 | –.01 | .19 | –.03 | –.07 | .01 | |||||||||
| 7. Monitoring Assumptions | 0.75 | 1.00 | .22 | .21 | .17 | .04 | .23 | –.06 | ||||||||
| 8. Recognition of Insufficient Information | 0.94 | 1.80 | –.01 | .58** | .34** | .23 | .33** | –.09 | .19 | |||||||
| 9. Recognizing Boundaries | 1.14 | 1.25 | –.09 | .07 | .38** | .21 | .11 | .04 | .27* | –.02 | ||||||
| 10. Selective Engagement | 1.07 | 1.29 | .05 | .13 | .28* | .17 | .01 | .07 | .17 | .09 | .51** | |||||
| 11. Self-Accountability | 0.95 | 1.20 | –.03 | .03 | .01 | .16 | –.05 | .15 | –.11 | –.05 | .08 | .01 | ||||
| 12. Strategy Selection | 0.92 | 0.79 | .09 | .39** | .47** | .24 | .08 | –.07 | .11 | .17 | .14 | –.09 | .01 | |||
| 13. Striving for Transparency | 2.09 | 2.16 | .03 | .16 | .31* | .33** | .03 | .08 | .15 | .19 | .05 | .05 | .12 | .07 | ||
| 14. Understanding Guidelines | 1.03 | 1.41 | .01 | .53** | .49** | .35** | .23 | .16 | .12 | .17 | .27* | .08 | .04 | .30* | .34** | |
| 15. Value/Norm Assessment | 1.94 | 1.97 | –.13 | .39** | .14 | .18 | .13 | .13 | .10 | .02 | –.11 | –.14 | .15 | .17 | .15 | .32** |
*
p < .05.
**
p < .01.