Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Rural Health. 2013 Oct 25;30(3):322–332. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12052

Table 4.

Results of Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Received by the Full Sample During the 6-Month Period Following Mailing Intervention.

FIT
n=500
Ed
n=499
UC
n=500
First CRC Test received n=103 n=28 n=28
FIT n=71* n=0 n=0
 Negative 86% (61) -- --
 Positive 14% (10) -- --
gFOBT n=2 n=1 n=7
 Negative 50% (1) 0% (0) 100% (7)
 Positive 50% (1) 100% (1) 0% (0)
Colonoscopy n=30 n=27 n=21
 No polyps detecteda 53% (16) 30% (8) 48% (10)
 Non-cancerousb polyps only detected 17% (5) 26% (7) 5% (1)
 Pre-cancerousc polyps detected 30% (9) 44% (12) 43% (9)
 Unknown type of polyp (poor prep) 0% (0) 0% (0) 5% (1)
No screening performed n=397 n=471 n=472
Follow-up for all with positive FIT or FOBT n=11 n=1 n=0
Colonoscopy n=8 n=1 n=0
 No polyps detecteda 63% (5) 0% (0) 0% (0)
 Non-cancerousb polyps only detected 0% (0) 100% (1) 0% (0)
 Pre-cancerousc polyps detected 38% (3) 0% (0) 0% (0)
No follow-up colonoscopy performed n=3** n=0 n=0
*

Results based on the full sample, which included 7 subjects who were ineligible due to symptoms or personal/family medical history but returned FIT; 2 received positive results.

**

Two subjects had terminal conditions with limited life expectancies and one subject refused.

1

Hemorrhoids or diverticulosis were often found among those with no polpys.

2

Includes hyperplastic polyps, squamous papillomas and lymphoid aggregate polyps.

3

All subjects in this category had tubular adenomas; 1 subject in the FIT group and 1 subject in the Ed group also had tubulovillous adenomas.