Table 3.
Association between area of residence and decayed teeth adjusting for demographic variables, health-related behaviours, material resources, social support and social capital† (N=1386)
| Area of residence |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Middle class OR (95% CI) |
Resettlement community | Slums | |
| Logit | |||
| Unadjusted | 1 | 0.25 (0.17 to 0.37)* | 0.24 (0.16 to 0.35)* |
| Adjusted for age, sex and religion | 1 | 0.21 (0.14 to 0.31)* | 0.20 (0.13 to 0.30)* |
| Fully adjusted for all covariates‡ | 1 | 0.21 (0.14 to 0.32)* | 0.21 (0.14 to 0.32)* |
| IRR (95% CI) | |||
| Negative binomial | |||
| Unadjusted | 1 | 0.95 (0.78 to 1.17) | 1.11 (0.91 to 1.35) |
| Adjusted for age, sex and eeligion | 1 | 1.02 (0.83 to 1.25) | 1.21 (0.99 to 1.47) |
| Fully adjusted for all covariates‡ | 1 | 1.01 (0.82 to 1.24) | 1.19 (0.97 to 1.46) |
*p<0.001.
†Association tested using Zero Inflated Negative Binomial Regression Method.
‡Fully adjusted for age, sex, religion, health-related behaviours, material resources, social support and social capital.
IRR, Incidence Rate Ratio.