Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Educ Psychol. 2014 Mar 10;106(3):779–798. doi: 10.1037/a0035984

Table 7.

Examination of equality of path coefficients between Grades 4, 5, and 6

df χ2 ∆df χ2
Model 1 Baseline Model 122 334.22***
Model 2 (compared to Model 1) Model with equal WM→TC 124 342.11*** 2 7.43*
Model 3 (compared to Model 1) Model with equal MP→TC 124 334.13*** 2 1.37
Model 4 (compared to Model 1) Model with equal SP→TC 124 330.70*** 2 0.85
Model 5 (compared to Model 1) Model with equal TC→Writing 124 334.24*** 2 0.60
Model 6 (compared to Model 1) Model with equal WM→Writing 124 332.88*** 2 0.45
Model 7 (compared to Model 1) Model with equal MP→Writing 124 335.54*** 2 1.32
Model 8 (compared to Model 1) Model with equal SP→Writing 124 335.22*** 2 0.99

Note.

*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001.