Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Hum Cap. 2013 Apr 1;2013:45. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2339225

Table 4.

Competing risks regressions using cognition as analysis time

(1) (2)
Failure: Problems Handling Money Not Financial Respondent
Memory disease diagnosis 0.842 0.627
(0.102) (0.162)
Control investments 0.885 1.182
(0.072) (0.198)
Control X Diagnosis 1.311 2.713*
(0.302) (1.062)
Stock share tercile 1.016 0.973
(0.036) (0.070)
Log wealth 0.984 1.002
(0.011) (0.031)
Own education 1.022 0.972
(0.012) (0.025)
Spouse’s education 1.004 1.157***
(0.012) (0.035)
Spouse’s cognition: CIND 0.739*** 0.637*
(0.061) (0.129)
Spouse’s cognition: dementia 0.745* 0.268*
(0.096) (0.152)
Spouse diagnosis 1.091 0.349
(0.185) (0.382)
Spouse’s problems handling money 1.083 0.358**
(0.109) (0.128)
Additional controls Yes Yes
N couples 7730 7730
N failures 1001 230
N competing risk 5 17

Hazard ratios reported. Additional controls for respondent gender and health insurance status, as well as respondent’s and spouse’s age, education, and self-rated health are included. Standard errors clustered at the household level.