Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Hum Cap. 2013 Apr 1;2013:45. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2339225

Table 5.

Bivariate probit regressions with outcomes “Difficulties handling money” and “no longer financial respondent”

(1) (2) (3)
Failure: Problems Not Financial Chi-squared test
Handling Money Respondent (p-value)
Memory disease diagnosis 0.916*** 0.193 24.12
(0.097) (0.126) (0.0000)
Control investments −0.069 0.050 1.77
(0.047) (0.077) (0.1837)
Control X Diagnosis 0.021 0.649** 6.31
(0.197) (0.224) (0.0120)
Stock share tercile 0.010 −0.013 0.44
(0.021) (0.029) (0.5077)
Log wealth −0.032*** −0.012 1.26
(0.007) (0.016) (0.2612)
Own education −0.010 −02021 0.41
(0.008) (0.014) (0.5223)
Spouse’s education −0.002 0.060*** 15.53
(0.009) (0.014) (0.0001)
Own cognition: CIND 0.466*** 0.230** 6.58
(0.049) (0.085) (0.0103)
Own cognition: dementia 1.291*** 0.844*** 13.62
(0.078) (0.119) (0.0002)
Spouse’s cognition: CIND −0.160** −0.177* 0.03
(0.052) (0.085) (0.8607)
Spouse’s cognition: dementia −0.027 −0.529** 5.85
(0.097) (0.187) (0.0156)
Spouse diagnosis 0.052 −0.222 1.02
(0.116) (0.246) (0.3118)
Spouse’s problems handling money −0.096 −0.478*** 9.56
(0.062) (0.109) (0.0020)
cons −1.012*** −4.063*** 43.32
(0.207) (0.413) (0.0000)
Additional controls Yes Yes Yes
athrho
cons 0.265***
(0.055)
N couples 7730

Coefficients reported. Additional controls for respondent gender and health insurance status, as well as respondent’s and spouse’s age, education, and self-rated health are included. Estimation uses HRS household level weights, with standard errors clustered at the household level.