Table A2.

Cox Proportional Hazards models using age as analysis time

	(1)	(2)	(3)
			Not fin R
	Problems	Not Financial	Conditional on
	Handling Money	Respondent	Problems handling money
Memory disease diagnosis	2.156***	2.307**	1.131
	(0.257)	(0.591)	(0.410)
Control investments	1.112	1.514*	1.171
	(0.100)	(0.266)	(0.494)
Control X Diagnosis	1.201	1.910	1.967
	(0.264)	(0.771)	(1.117)
Stock share tercile	0.918*	0.905	0.861
	(0.032)	(0.062)	(0.104)
Log wealth	0.961***	0.975	1.062
	(0.011)	(0.029)	(0.057)
Own cognition: CIND	1.904***	1.266	1.583
	(0.155)	(0.236)	(0.700)
Own cognition: dementia	3.352***	3.356***	5.303***
	(0.354)	(0.714)	(1.801)
Own education	1.014	0.994	1.024
	(0.014)	(0.030)	(0.051)
Spouse’s education	0.995	1.126***	1.069
	(0.013)	(0.035)	(0.065)
Spouse’s cognition: CIND	0.740***	0.661*	0.729
	(0.059)	(0.124)	(0.244)
Spouse’s cognition: dementia	0.836	0.241**	0.247
	(0.111)	(0.116)	(0.189)
Spouse diagnosis	1.041	0.455	0.000
	(0.153)	(0.324)	(.)
Spouse’s problems handling money	1.004	0.408**	1.132
	(0.099)	(0.132)	(0.510)
Additional controls	Yes	Yes	Yes
N couples	7730	7730	725
N failures	1654	325	73

Hazard ratios reported. Additional controls for respondent gender, health insurance status, and spouse’s age, as well as respondent’s and spouse’s education and self-rated health are included. Standard errors clustered at the household level.