Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Hum Cap. 2013 Apr 1;2013:45. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2339225

Table A3.

Cox proportional hazards using cognition as analysis time

(1) (2)
Problems Handling Money Not Financial Respondent
Memory disease diagnosis 0.869 0.658
(0.086) (0.163)
Control investments 1.034 1.351
(0.084) (0.234)
Control X Diagnosis 1.206 2.475*
(0.222) (0.916)
Stock share tercile 0.997 0.935
(0.033) (0.066)
Log total assets 0.985 1.003
(0.010) (0.030)
Own education 1.012 0.982
(0.012) (0.029)
Spouse’s education 1.000 1.143***
(0.012) (0.037)
Spouse’s cognition: CIND 0.704*** 0.616*
(0.051) (0.116)
Spouse’s cognition: dementia 0.754* 0.221**
(0.083) (0.108)
Spouse diagnosis 0.961 0.491
(0.134) (0.359)
Spouse’s problems handling money 1.050 0.392**
(0.095) (0.129)
Additional controls Yes Yes
N couples 7730 7730

Hazard ratios reported. Additional controls for respondent gender and health insurance status, as well as respondent’s and spouse’s age, education, and self-rated health are included. Standard errors clustered at the household level.