TABLE 3.
Ref | Light source/Wavelength | Spot area (cm2) | Performance characteristics | Muscle(s) | Exercise |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
de Almeida et al, 2012 | Laser 660nm versus 830nm | 0.0028 |
|
Biceps brachii | MVC per 60 s in Scott bench |
Gorgey et al, 2008 | Cluster with 4 diodes laser 808 nm |
|
Femoral quadriceps | Isokinetic dynamometer | |
Leal Junior et al, 2008 | Laser 655 nm | 0.01 |
|
Biceps brachii | Scott bench |
Leal Junior et al, 2009e | Laser 830 nm | 0.0028 |
|
Biceps brachii | Scott bench |
Leal Junior et al, 2010b | Cluster with 5 diodes laser 810 nm | 0.0364 |
|
Biceps brachii | Scott bench |
Baroni et al, 2010a | Cluster with 5 diodes laser 810 nm | 0.029 |
|
Femoral quadriceps | Isokinetic dynamometer |
De Marchi et al, 2012 | Cluster with 5 laser diodes 810 nm | 0.0364 |
|
Femoral quadriceps, hamstrings, gastrocnemius | Running on treadmill until exhaustion |
Leal Junior et al, 2009a | Laser 810 nm versus Cluster with 69 LEDs 660/850 nm |
0.036 versus 0.2 |
versus
|
Rectus femoris | Wingate test |
Leal Junior et al, 2009d | Cluster with 69 LEDs 660/850 nm | 0.2 |
|
Biceps brachii | Scott bench |
Baroni et al, 2010b | Cluster with 69 LEDs 660/850 nm | 0.2 cm2 |
|
Femoral quadriceps | Isokinetic dynamometer |