Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Dec 16;9(12):e114617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114617

Transcriptional Consequence and Impaired Gametogenesis with High-Grade Aneuploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana

Kuan-Lin Lo 1,#, Long-Chi Wang 2,#, I-Ju Chen 1, Yu-Chen Liu 1, Mei-Chu Chung 1, Wan-Sheng Lo 1,*
Editor: Qinghua Shi3
PMCID: PMC4267805  PMID: 25514186

Abstract

Aneuploidy features a numerical chromosome variant that the number of chromosomes in the nucleus of a cell is not an exact multiple of the haploid number, which may have an impact on morphology and gene expression. Here we report a tertiary trisomy uncovered by characterizing a T-DNA insertion mutant (aur2-1/+) in the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) AURORA2 locus. Whole-genome analysis with DNA tiling arrays revealed a chromosomal translocation linked to the aur2-1 allele, which collectively accounted for a tertiary trisomy 2. Morphologic, cytogenetic and genetic analyses of aur2-1 progeny showed impaired male and female gametogenesis to various degrees and a tight association of the aur2-1 allele with the tertiary trisomy that was preferentially inherited. Transcriptome analysis showed overlapping and distinct gene expression profiles between primary and tertiary trisomy 2 plants, particularly genes involved in response to stress and various types of external and internal stimuli. Additionally, transcriptome and gene ontology analyses revealed an overrepresentation of nuclear-encoded organelle-related genes functionally involved in plastids, mitochondria and peroxisomes that were differentially expressed in at least three if not all Arabidopsis trisomics. These observations support a previous hypothesis that aneuploid cells have higher energy requirement to overcome the detrimental effects of an unbalanced genome. Moreover, our findings extend the knowledge of the complex nature of the T-DNA insertion event influencing plant genomic integrity by creating high-grade trisomy. Finally, gene expression profiling results provide useful information for future research to compare primary and tertiary trisomics for the effects of aneuploidy on plant cell physiology.

Introduction

Aneuploid cells contain a chromosome variant with chromosome number other than a multiple of the basic (monoploid) chromosome number (x), which may alter large-scale gene expression leading to cellular malfunction and diseases due to genomic imbalance [1], [2]. Aneuploidy results from failure of the chromosomes or chromatids to separate properly to opposite poles during meiosis or mitosis. Trisomy (2n = 2x+1) is a type of aneuploidy that involves an extra copy of a particular chromosome rather than the normal number of 2 [2]. In humans, trisomy causes severe developmental defects in fetuses, and only newborns with a few types of trisomy can survive [3]. The most commonly known disease caused by trisomy in humans is Down syndrome, which affects individuals with an extra chromosome 21 in whole or in part [4].

Recent work has suggested that the unbalanced genome in aneuploidy may result in loss of genomic integrity and epigenetic changes in many organisms [5][7]. Genes on the aneuploid chromosomes frequently show a dosage compensation effect that probably helps mitigate the harmful consequences of genomic imbalance. Despite the detrimental effects in cells, aneuploidy sometimes provides a means for adapting to selective pressure [8]. Aneuploidy is highly associated with poor prognosis, high malignancy and increased drug resistance in tumorgenesis [9][11]. Studies of humans, mice and yeast suggest that an abnormality in chromosome number or structure alters cellular physiology by resulting in changes in genome stability, imbalanced protein homeostasis and numerous dysfunctional growth characteristics (see reviews in [10], [12], [13]).

Whole-chromosome aneuploidy, which can be used to examine the physiological effects in aneuploid cells, is relatively easy to generate and maintain than high-grade aneuploidy [5], [14]. However, the molecular mechanisms and transcriptional signatures underlying the organismic physiological alterations of aneuploidy are not fully understood [14]. Considering the diverse phenotypes induced by different degrees of aneuploidy, whether the knowledge from the studies of simple aneuploidy can be informative for understanding the role of complicated aneuploidy in cancer and genetic diseases is unclear [15]. Thus, further studies of the cellular physiology of aneuploidy will increase our understanding of the causal effects and consequences of genomic imbalance in eukaryotic cells.

Plants are more tolerant than animals to genomic imbalance caused by aneuploidy [1] and can be manipulated to generate different karyotypes for viable individuals [1], [12]. Thus, research of plants has provided an excellent opportunity to study the transcriptional consequence of different types of aneuploidy. Trisomy in the 5 chromosomes in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has been described, and different types of trisomy can be distinguished morphologically as compared with diploid (2n = 2x) plants [1], [16]. Different types of trisomy have been documented in plants primarily by genetic, cytogenetic and morphological analyses. Trisomic plants produce offspring with various karyotypes; most of the progeny are diploid and some are trisomic. Tetrasomics (2n = 2x+2) are extremely rare, and some types of tetrasomy have never been observed [16]. Tertiary trisomy (2n = 2x+T) is present in individuals carrying an extra copy of a chromosome consisting of portions of 2 non-homologous chromosomes in the genome [2].

Transgenic plants carrying T-DNA insertions have been widely used in plant research for forward and reverse genetics to generate mutants for functional studies [17]. A T-DNA inserted in genomic sequence should disrupt or reduce the function of a gene if insertion is near or within the coding sequence. However, several reports have documented T-DNA insertions resulting in or associated with chromosomal abnormalities such as sequence deletion, duplication, the addition of unknown filler sequences, or chromosome rearrangement in plants [18], [19]. We have limited information about the physiological consequences of numerical abnormalities in chromosomes resulting from T-DNA insertions. A previous study demonstrated that a transgenic tobacco line with a T-DNA insertion generated trisomic and tetrasomic offspring [6], [7]. However, the cause of the aneuploid progeny was unclear.

In this study, we uncovered an example of high-grade aneuploidy (tertiary trisomy 2) when characterizing a T-DNA insertion allele in the Arabidopsis AURORA2 locus at chromosome 2. The aur2-1 mutation was associated with defective development in male and female gametophytes and showed unusual genetic transmission. Additionally, we found more genes on the non-triplicated chromosomes that were mis-expressed in the high-grade trisomy than the primary trisomy 2; the former carried a chromosomal translocation that would have a significant impact on cell physiology. Finally, transcriptome and gene ontology (GO) analysis revealed overrepresentation of genes involved in the stress response, plastids and mitochondria in two primary and one tertiary trisomics, which supported increased energy demand and cellular metabolism as a common response to different types of stress resulting from genomic imbalance in aneuploidy [20].

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and growth conditions

The wild-type A. thaliana ecotype Columbia-0 (Col-0); two T-DNA insertion mutants of AUR2, Wisconsin DsLox T-DNA line (WisDsLox_368B03; CS853125) and GABI-Kat line (GK403B02; CS438606); and the quartet mutant, qrt2-1 (Landsberg erecta, Ler, CS8051) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC) or Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre (NASC). We designated the T-DNA insertion alleles in AUR2 (At2g25880) as aur2-1 (WisDsLox_368B03) and aur2-2 (GK403B02) according to a previous study [21]. The aur2-1 line was designated AAa, where “a” indicates the T-DNA insertion at AUR2, and the diploid and trisomic plants derived from the aur2-1 line but lacking a T-DNA insertion were designated AA and AAA, respectively. The plants were cultivated in growth chambers under long-day conditions (16 h-light/8 h-dark) at 22°C with light intensity 100–150 µE m−2 s−1. Primers used to genotype the aur2-1 allele were RP, 5’-cgaaatcgcttgtagtccatc-3’; LP, 5’-ggcaatggagaagagtgtcac-3’; and BP, 5’-aacgtccgcaatgtgttattaagttgtc-3’.

Pollen viability and in vitro germination assays

Staining for pollen viability was as described previously [22] with minor modifications. Briefly, fluorescein diacetate (FDA) (Sigma) was dissolved in 0.5% (w/v) acetone and diluted (1∶49) in 10% sucrose as a working solution. Mature pollen grains were incubated with FDA staining solution for 15 min in the dark before observation under a fluorescence microscope (Axio Scope A1, Zeiss). The number of viable and non-viable pollen grains was counted by use of ImageQuant TL (GE Healthcare). The in vitro germination assay was performed as described [23]. The morphologic features of germinating pollen and pollen tube elongation were examined and scored under a microscope. The length of the elongated pollen tube was measured by use of ImageJ (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/).

Morphologic analysis of pollen grains, ovules, embryogenesis and seed formation

For analysis of tetrads in the qrt2-1/qrt2-1 and aur2-1/+ qrt2-1/qrt2-1 plants, mature pollen grains from open flowers were transferred to filtered water and observed on slides under a microscope. Mature pollens treated with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma) were placed on a slide and examined under a florescence microscope as described [24]. To observe the phenotype of mature ovules, we emasculated flowers at stage 12 [25], then fixed carpels for 2 d to ensure that the maximum number of ovules reached maturity. To observe the developing embryos, flowers were manually pollinated and siliques were fixed 6 or 10 d after pollination (DAP). Carpels or siliques were fixed and cleared as described [26]. Ovules or developing seeds were mounted in the clearing solution and examined under a microscope with differential interference contrast (DIC) optics. To evaluate fertilization and seed formation, self- or manually pollinated flowers were further grown for 10 d. Siliques were collected and dissected to score seed sets and unfertilized ovules.

Chromosome preparation for cytological analyses

The chromosome spreads for DAPI staining in pollen mother cells (PMCs) and shoot apical meristem (SAM) cells were performed as described [27], [28]. PMC and SAM cells were fixed with fresh Carnoy fixative [ethanol-acetic acid (3∶1, v/v)] at 4°C overnight and stored at −20°C. The tissues were washed once with filtered water and twice with citrate buffer (10 mM sodium citrate, pH 4.8) and incubated in digestion solution [0.02% (w/v) cellulase ONOZUKA R-10 and 0.2% (w/v) Macerozyme R-10 (both from Yakult, Japan) in citrate buffer] at 37°C for 1 h. Then tissues were washed with filtered water, decomposed in a drop of 60% acetic acid, fixed on slides, and stained with DAPI solution for fluorescence microscopy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of mitotic cells in SAM was performed as described [29]. All images were acquired by use of AxioVision software (Zeiss) and analyzed by use of Adobe Photoshop CS2.

Cryo-scanning electron microscopy (Cryo-SEM)

Fully open flowers were dissected and loaded on stubs, then samples were frozen with liquid nitrogen slush and transferred to a preparation chamber at −160°C. After 5 min, the temperature was raised to −85°C and sublimed for 15 min. After being coated with platinum (Pt) at −130°C, samples were transferred to the cold stage in the SEM chamber and observed at −160°C by use of Cryo-SEM (FEI Quanta 200 SEM/Quorum Cryo System PP2000TR FEI) at 20 KV.

Comparative genome hybridization with Arabidopsis tilling array (array CGH)

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from rosette leaves by use of the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen). Affymetrix Arabidopsis Tilling 1.0R arrays were used for hybridization with labeled gDNA prepared from Col-0 and trisomic plants (AAA and AAa, see above). DNA labeling, hybridization, and detection followed the manufacturer’s instructions (Affymetrix). Probe sequences from the BPMAP specification of the array (At35b-MR_v04-2_TIGRv5) were mapped to the TAIR10 genome by use of BLAT [30]. Intensity normalization involved the AffyTiling package of BioConductor. Probe locations and normalized signals were joined and sorted by use of an in-house perl script. Raw data for the tilling array are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) (accession nos. GSM980297, GSM980298 and GSM980299).

Whole-genome transcriptome analysis

For expression microarray analysis, samples of total RNA were prepared from 26-d-old plants of the wild type (Col-0), trisomy 2 (AUR2, round leaves, AAA genome), and tertiary trisomy 2 (aur2-1; round leaves, AAa genome), respectively. The karyotype and genotype were first scored by leaf morphology (round leaves), then underwent genotyping before sample collection. RNA samples from the rosette leaves of multiple plants (21–35 plants) were extracted by use of the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN). Florescence labeling, hybridization to probes and detection followed the manufacturer’s instructions (Affymetrix). The sequence annotation for the Affymetrix ATH1 oligos was downloaded from TAIR and processed by use of Excel (Microsoft); probe sets not mapping to two or more gene loci were selected [5]. Sequence-specific probe effects were removed by use of the GC-RMA package from R software [31]. The 14,976 probe sets for genes on chromosomes 1, 4, and 5 and those on chromosome 3 from the 3′ end of At3g20040 (AUR2) to the end were selected for model fitting by use of vsn package [32] and the hybridization intensities were then normalized by using the fitted model [5]. Genes on the non-triplicated chromosome with sufficiently strong expression were isolated as described (Figure S4 in S1 File) [5], [14]. Changes in gene expression and gene ontology (GO) analysis involved use of GeneSpring (Agilent) and ArgoGO [33]. The raw data for Affymetrix ATH1 arrays are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) (accession no. GSE54827).

Results

Identification of a trisomic Arabidopsis plant with a T-DNA insertion

In this study, we discovered two types of aneuploidy in a heterozygous T-DNA insertional mutant (aur2-1/+) (Figures S1A and S1B in S1 File) and its descendants. The proportion of undeveloped seeds in self-fertilized plants was 18.6% and 1.2% for aur2-1/+ and the wild type (WT = Col-0), respectively, under the same growth conditions (Table S1 and Figure S1C in S1 File), which suggests defective fertilization or embryo development or both in aur2-1/+. The round shape of rosette leaves in the progeny of aur2-1/+ is consistent with the description of an aneuploid mutant with trisomy 2 in Arabidopsis [1], [16], [34] (Fig. 1A–iv). Thus, we examined the metaphase chromosome spread of mitotic cells to confirm this possibility. WT cells had 10 chromosomes (2n = 2x), and aur2-1/+ cells had 11 (2n = 2x+1) (Fig. 1B). We next analyzed the meiotic chromosome spreads in pollen mother cells (Fig. 1C). The number of DAPI-stained chromosomes differed between WT and aur2-1/+ as early as diakinesis stage. Chromosome spreads showed 1 univalent plus 5 bivalents or 1 pentavalent plus 3 bivalents for aur2-1/+ but 5 typical bivalents in the WT (Fig. 1C, viii-a and viii-b vs. ii). The WT showed the 5 bivalents aligned along an equatorial plate, whereas an extra univalent out of the metaphase plate appeared in aur2-1/+ at metaphase I (Fig. 1C, iii vs. ix). Furthermore, in the WT, 5 pairs of sister chromatids were segregated to each daughter cell, whereas aur2-1/+ showed an extra DAPI dot in each nucleus during sporogenesis from anaphase-II and telophase-II to pollen tetrads (Fig. 1C, v–vi vs. xi–xii). Additionally, we analyzed the karyotype of aur2-1/+ by using 5S and 45S rDNA probes labeled with different dyes in dicolor FISH (Fig. 1D, right panel) [35]: aur2-1/+ showed 11 DAPI-stained chromosomes from shoot apical meristem cells and 3 sets of green florescence dye (45S rDNA) at chromosome 2 (Fig. 1D, left panel). In sum, both the rosette leaf phenotype and cytological studies demonstrated that aur2-1/+ is trisomy 2 and the additional chromosome appears to have a functional centromere for chromosome segregation during meiosis and mitosis.

Figure 1. The aur2-1/+ mutant is trisomy 2.

Figure 1

(A) Rosette phenotype of wild type (Col-0) and progeny from self-fertilized aur2-1/+. W, wild-type rosette leaves; R, round-shaped rosette leaves; T, tiny rosette leaves. (B) Metaphase spreads of the mitotic cells from Col-0 and aur2-1/+. (C) Meiosis in pollen mother cells of Col-0 and aur2-1/+. DAPI-stained chromosomes in different meiotic stages. Yellow arrows, extra univalents; red arrow, pentavalent; yellow stars, extra sister chromatids. (D) Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of aur2-1/+. Metaphase spreads of the aur2-1/+ mitotic cells probed with FITC-labeled 45S rDNA (green) and rhodamine-labeled 5S rDNA (red). Dashed lines, outline of DAPI-stained chromosome. Scale bar in (A) 2 cm; (B) 5 µm; (C) 10 µm; (D) 2 µm.

Genotype and karyotype of aur2-1/+ progeny

On genotyping nearly 1,000 plants of the self-fertilized heterozygous aur2-1/+ mutant, we did not find any homozygous progeny, which suggests that the aur2-1 allele may have an unusual inheritance in the trisomic genome. To understand the genetic behavior and genomic constitution of aur2-1/+, we performed genotype and karyotype analyses of aur2-1/+ progeny. By reciprocal crosses between the aur2-1/+ and WT, we found a 25.2% transmission rate of aur2-1 from aur2-1/+ ovules, which was comparable to that of aur2-1 in F1 progeny of self-fertilized aur2-1/+ plants (27.1%); however, we found no aur2-1 allele in F1 progeny when WT ovules were pollinated with aur2-1/+ pollen (Table 1). Therefore, pollen failed to transmit the aur2-1 allele to offspring and the inheritance of aur2-1 allele is mainly through maternal transmission.

Table 1. Genetic analysis of aur2-1/+ inheritance.

Genotype of parents (female×male) Genotype of F1 progeny Plants Plants with an aur2-1 allele (%)
AUR2 aur2-1 HZa aur2-1 HMb
aur2-1/+ self-fertilized 140 52 0 192 27.08
aur2-1/+ × Col-0 122 41 0 163 25.15
Col-0 × aur2-1/+ 115 0 0 115 0
a

HZ, heterozygous.

b

HM, homozygous.

Because the round leaf phenotype is a morphological characteristic of Arabidopsis trisomy 2 plants, we used it as a reference to visually assess the karyotype of plants [16], [34]. We found 3 major types of aur2-1/+ progeny from both self-fertilization and reciprocal crosses: plants carrying a WT AUR2 with WT leaves (AUR2, W) or round leaves (AUR2, R) and aur2-1/+ plants with round leaves (aur2-1/+, R) (Table 2; Fig. 1A); however, we found no aur2-1/+ plants with WT leaves. In addition, we found a few plants (7/242) from self-fertilized aur2-1/+ with extremely small and tiny (T) round leaves that died before bolting (Table 2, Fig. 1A-v). Tetrasomics grow slowly and show an enhanced phenotype as compared with corresponding trisomics in Arabidopsis and other species [16], [36]; thus, the plants with tiny rosette leaves may be tetrasomics.

Table 2. Genotype and rosette leaf phenotype in the progeny of self-fertilized and backcrossed aur2-1/+.

AUR2 aur2-1/+
Leaf phenotype (genotype)d Wa (AA) Rb (AAA) Tc Wa (Aa) Rb (AAa) Tc Plants
Cross
aur2-1/+ self-fertilized 152 11 0 0 72 7 242
aur2-1/+ × Col-0 71 4 0 0 26 0 101
a

W, plants with wild-type rosette leaves.

b

R, plants with round rosette leaves.

c

T, plants with tiny stature and round rosette leaves.

d

Predicted genotype.

Chromosomal translocation in the aur2-1/+ trisomy

Two types of trisomy 2 progeny with round leaves were derived from self-fertilized aur2-1/+ plants: WT (AAA) and aur2-1/+ (AAa) (Fig. 1A, iii and iv). For simplicity, A and a hereafter represent chromosome 2 (Chr.2) carrying an AUR2 and an aur2-1 allele, respectively. To survey possible additional mutation(s) and validate an extra copy of Chr.2 in aur2-1/+, we used DNA tiling arrays for CGH (array CGH) to comprehensively inspect the whole genomes of WT trisomy (AAA), aur2-1/+ trisomy (AAa), and diploid Col-0 (AA) (Fig. 2A). In comparing the signal intensity of hybridized probes in Col-0 and the trisomic genomes (AAA and AAa), array CGH confirmed the chromosomal imbalance in the trisomic mutants. The ratio of probe intensities in AAA to Col-0 (red dots) indicates a duplication of Chr.2 in the AAA genome (Fig. 2A, left column). However, in the aur2-1/+ genome, only part of Chr.2 ( ˜11 Mb), including the whole short arm (2S) and part of the long arm (2L), showed increased signal intensity (Fig. 2A, blue dots). The signals of the remaining long arm of Chr.2 ( ˜8 Mb) were comparable to those for the WT genome (Fig. 2A). These results suggest that the extra Chr.2 in aur2-1/+ was broken in the middle of long arm and the region extending from the breakpoint was deleted. We found increased signals in the short arm of chromosome 3 (Chr.3S, ˜7 Mb), which indicates a chromosomal duplication in this region (Fig. 2A, middle column). Use of a moving average to merge two sets of signals revealed a simple duplication of Chr.2 in the AAA genome, with a deletion of Chr.2L and a duplication of Chr.3S in the aur2-1/+ genome. These results suggest a chromosomal translocation of the Chr.3S fragment to the Chr.2L region in the aur2-1/+ trisomic genome (Fig. 2B, 2n = 2x+T(2L/3S) = AAa). The findings are consistent with the cytogenetic data supporting that aur2-1/+ is tertiary trisomy 2. The extra chromosome could presumably be paired with the segments of the regular chromosome 2 and 3 to form a pentavalent at the diakinesis stage (Fig. 1C, viii-b).

Figure 2. The aur2-1/+ is tertiary trisomy 2 revealed by array comparative genome hybridization (array CGH).

Figure 2

(A) The log2 ratios of signal intensity of Arabidopsis chromosomes in trisomics (AAA or AAa) to wild-type diploids (Col-0). Each dot indicates one set of probes corresponding to a unique position on the chromosomes (Chr.). Locations of centromeres are the area with fewer dots. Shaded area in chromosome 2 indicates the region containing the translocation breakpoint. (B) A schematic representation of chromosome 2 in aur2-1/+. S, short; L, long arm of chromosomes. (C) The log2 ratios of signal intensity of chloroplast and mitochondria genomes in trisomy (AAA or Aaa) to wild-type diploid (Col-0). Genome duplication is identified by the ratio shifting above the baseline at 0. The moving average is a series of averages of 10 probe sets.

We further determined the potential breakpoint in Chr.2L and Chr.3S (Fig. 2A, shaded regions) by plotting the ratio of hybridization signals against an 80-kb genomic region in the two trisomic genomes, AAa and AAA (Figure S2A in S1 File). The translocation breakpoint was mapped and plotted against the annotated genes. The AUR2 locus (At2g25880) was located proximal to the Chr.2L breakpoint (Figure S2B in S1 File, upper panel) and the 3S breakpoint was at the 5′ end of At3g20040 (Figure S2B in S1 File, lower panel). The T-DNA insertion site of the AUR2 locus was in close proximity to the breakpoint, which explains the tight association of aur2-1 allele with the chromosomal translocation (Figure S2B in S1 File). The interchanged chromosome structure in the aur2-1/+ genome may have originated from a T-DNA insertion event.

Interestingly, we found increased intensity of the tiling probes representing genes in the chloroplast (plastid) and the mitochondrial genomes in both the tertiary (aur2-1/+) and primary (AAA) trisomy as compared with the diploid WT (Fig. 2C). Array CGH of AAA and AAa genomes revealed a comparable increase in chloroplast genomic sequences, which suggests the presence of homologous sequences in the trisomic genomes. Alternatively, the number of chloroplasts may be increased in the aneuploid cells. A 620-kb sequence proximal to the centromere region of Arabidopsis Chr.2 contains highly homologous sequences to the 350-kb mitochondrial genome [37], [38]. Thus, the increased mitochondrial sequences in the array CGH analysis of the two trisomics may result from the imbalanced copy number of Chr.2. However, a portion of the mitochondrion genome is not significantly enriched in the AAa genome, probably because of a translocation of the sub-chromosomal region of Chr.3 in the genome.

Phenotypic consequences of chromosome translocation in aur2-1/+

We showed a higher ratio of undeveloped seeds or unfertilized ovules in tertiary trisomy 2 (AAa, aur2-1/+) than WT plants (18.6% vs. 0.8%) (Table S1 and Figure S1C in S1 File). To determine which source of gametophytes, parental or maternal, was involved in the phenotype, we performed reciprocal crosses between aur2-1/+ and WT. Manually crossing aur2-1/+ with WT pollen (aur2-1/+ × Col-0) or ovules (Col-0×aur2-1/+) resulted in 14.7% and 8.3% undeveloped seeds, respectively, in F1 progeny (Table S1 in S1 File), which suggests that mutations in aur2-1/+ cause fertility defects in both parental and maternal gametophytes. To investigate whether the fertility phenotype was attributed to the trisomic genome or any additional mutations associated with aur2-1/+, we examined seed development in siliques of WT (Col-0), diploid sibs of WT (AA), trisomy 2 (AAA), and tertiary trisomy 2 (AAa) plants. We found undeveloped seeds and deformed siliques of irregular size along the stems in both AAa and AAA but not AA or WT plants, which suggests that the trisomic genome is mainly responsible for the phenotype (Figs. 3A and 3B).

Figure 3. Phenotypic analyses in the trisomic plants.

Figure 3

(A) Siliques from 7-week-old plants of wild type (Col-0), diploid sib (AA), trisomy 2 (AAA) and tertiary trisomy 2 (aur2-1/+; AAa) were collected and aligned from left to right in their order from bottom to top along the stems of individual plants. A similar phenotype was scored for at least 5 plants for each genetic background, and one representative set is shown. (B) Seed development in the siliques with comparable size shown in (A). Undeveloped seeds or aborted ovules are indicated by arrows. (C) Ovule development in Col-0 and AAa by DIC microscopy. Arrows indicate secondary endosperm nucleus (SEN), egg nucleus (EN) and synergid cell nucleus (SN). Quantitative data are indicated. (D) Morphology of pollen grains by scanning electron microscopy. Aberrant pollen grains are indicated by arrows. (E) Quantitative analysis of pollen viability by FDA staining. n, number of pollen grains scored. (F) The 4 products of 1 meiosis tetrad stay attached at the mature pollen stage in aur2-1/+ qrt2-1/qrt2-1 double mutant. Representative DIC and fluorescence (DAPI) staining of the same mature pollen in upper and lower panels, respectively. Three types of segregation of normal pollen to aborted pollens (indicated by arrows) are shown above the upper panel and ratios from 53 tetrads are indicated below the lower panel. Scale bar in (A) 0.5 cm; (B) 200 µm; (C) 50 µm; (D) 20 µm; (F) 10 µm.

Abnormal transmission of the aur2-1 allele in self-fertilized aur2-1/+ may result from defective gametophytes, thus leading to sterility. To investigate this possibility, we examined the gametogenesis of ovules and pollen. We first inspected unfertilized ovules of AAa and WT by DIC light microscopy. The secondary endosperm nucleus (SEN) and egg nucleus (EN) in the embryo sac are clear, but in most cases, only 1 of the 2 synergid cell nuclei (SN) can be found in the same focal plane [39]. We found several types of abnormal ovules in both the WT and AAa plants (Fig. 3C). Degraded ovules still have the normal shape of ovules, but the boundaries of cells were unidentifiable (Fig. 3C, Degraded). Some of the ovules do not have an SEN and SN but have one EN (Fig. 3C, One nucleus), and some do not have any visible nucleus (Fig. 3C, No nucleus). A small number of ovules showed fusiform morphologic features (Fig. 3C, Fusiform). AAa plants appeared to have more “degraded” and “one-nucleus” ovules than the WT (Fig. 3C). Most of the WT ovules (96%) showed normal features as compared with Aaa (78.2%), so aur2-1 is associated with defective ovule development. This observation agreed with findings that only 25.15% of the progeny carried the aur2-1 allele transmitted from maternal gametophytes (Table 1).

We next examined the morphology and viability of pollen grains by Cryo-SEM and staining with FDA, respectively. AAa produced more aborted and shrunken pollen grains than did AAA and WT (Fig. 3D). Consistently, the proportion of viable pollen grains was comparable in WT and AA (approximately 90%) and slightly decreased in AAA (83.2%) but significantly reduced to 58.8% in AAa plants (Fig. 3E). Thus, although the trisomic genome (AAA) causes slightly reduced fertility, chromosome translocation associated with the aur2-1 allele apparently results in a severe defect in pollen development. In addition to pollen development, the failed transmission of aur2-1 allele by pollen might result from defects in pollen tube germination or elongation. The in vitro germination assay revealed more germinated pollen and elongated pollen tubes in the WT than in AAa (83.5% vs. 30.8%) (Figure S3A in S1 File). Therefore, both viability and germination of pollen grains were lower in AAa than the WT.

We introduced quartet2 (qrt2) to generate the aur2-1/+ qrt2-1/qrt2-1 double mutant for tetrad analysis. QRT2 is essential for separating pollen grains from the 4 tetrads of meiosis during pollen development, so use of qrt2 allows for analysis of allele segregation in aur2-1/+ pollen [40], [41]. We found 3 types of pollen tetrads in aur2-1/+ segregating at 4∶0 (30/53 = 56.6%), 3∶1 (10/53 = 18.9%), and 2∶2 (13/53 = 24.5%) viable to non-viable pollen (Fig. 3F, upper panel). Furthermore, DAPI staining of nuclear DNA revealed WT-like pollen grains in tetrads with 1 vegetative and 2 sperm nuclei, which were absent in degraded pollen grains (Fig. 3F, lower panel). Taken together, our results from genetic and morphological analyses of ovules and pollen indicate that both types of gametophytes in aur2-1/+ are defective to different degrees, which is likely responsible for the impaired transmission of aur2-1 allele.

Additionally, we sought to determine whether embryo development was affected by the tertiary trisomy 2. The ovules from WT or AAa were manually fertilized with WT pollen and developing embryos were examined between 2 and 6 DAP. Most of the embryos (256/269 = 95.2%) were successfully developed from ovules of AAa fertilized with WT pollen as compared with embryos (242/243 = 99.6%) from fertilized WT ovules; however, the embryo development was slightly delayed for fertilized AAa ovules. For developing embryos at 6 DAP, 69.1% (186/269) and 25.7% (69/269) of fertilized ovules in AAa developed to the heart and torpedo stages, respectively, as compared with 37.9% (92/243) and 61.7% (150/243) of WT embryos, respectively (Figure S3B in S1 File). Therefore, the undeveloped seeds shown in Figure S1C in S1 File are not due to aborted embryo development but most likely to defective gametophytes for effective fertilization.

Gene expression profiles in primary and tertiary trisomy 2

Phenotypic alterations resulting from genomic imbalance in aneuploidy involve changes in gene expression [1], [42]-[44]. To evaluate the global effect of the whole-chromosome and high-grade aneuploidy on gene expression, we used microarray assay to analyze the transcriptome profiles of WT, trisomy 2 (AAA), and tertiary trisomy 2 (AAa). Consistent with observations from array CGH (Fig. 2A), we found upregulated expression of genes in the triplicated chromosomes of the AAA and AAa corresponding to the trisomic chromosomal regions (Fig. 4A). We next investigated the expression patterns of genes on non-triplicated chromosomes [Chr.1, 3(3’), 4, 5] by normalization with the whole genome that excluded the trisomic regions as previously described [14]. To identify differentially expressed genes, we compared the gene expression profiles in the two trisomy 2 examples, AAA and AAa, with that in the WT (Fig. 4B, p<0.05). Interestingly, the number of misregulated genes in AAa (1358) was 1.7 times more than that in AAA (796), which indicates that the chromosomal translocation in the tertiary trisomy (AAa) affects more genes than the simple trisomy (AAA) (Fig. 4B). We further categorized 325 genes that were misregulated in both AAA and AAa into four groups based on the expression patterns and assigned GO terms to define functional properties (Fig. 4C). Approximately 78% of genes showed expression regulated by both AAa and AAA (Groups II and IV), whereas 22% were inversely regulated (Groups I and III).

Figure 4. Whole-genome transcriptome analysis in trisomic plants.

Figure 4

(A) The log2 ratios of the expression of all genes in trisomics (AAA or AAa) relative to wild-type diploids (Col-0). Each dot indicates one set of probes corresponding to a unique position on the chromosomes (Chr.). Positive and negative values indicate upregulated and downregulated expression, respectively. Locations of centromeres are the area with no gene expression. (B) Venn diagram shows the specific and overlapping genes with significant misregulated expression compared to wild-type diploid (Col-0) between trisomy 2 (AAa) and tertiary trisomy 2 (AAA) (p<0.05). (C) Clustering and heat map of the 325 misregulated genes common to the two trisomics (AAA and AAa). Four groups of genes based on expression patterns are shown on the right.

GO term analysis revealed a significant enrichment of genes involved in defense response/incompatible interaction (false discovery rate [FDR] = 8.8E-24), immune response (FDR = 8.6E-09 and 2.1E-03), response to stimulus (FDR = 2E-23 and 5.7E-03) and stress (FDR = 1.0E-13 and 1.6E-04) (Table 3). Furthermore, GO terms related to response to chemical or hormone stimulus were enriched in both the upregulated (Group II, FDR = 3E-22 and 3.5E-15) and downregulated (Group IV, FDR = 2.5E-02 and 3.3E-02) groups of genes. Finally, genes involved in secondary metabolic processes (FDR = 1E-04) and lipid transport (FDR = 1.9E-09) were overrepresented as upregulated genes (Group II), whereas those responding to auxin stimulus (FDR = 3.5E-06) and carbohydrate metabolic process (FDR = 4.6E-02) were enriched as downregulated genes (Group IV). Our analysis suggests that cellular responses to different types of stimuli or stress may be evoked by both primary and tertiary trisomy 2, thus leading to physiological changes in regulating growth, hormone signaling and metabolic processes.

Table 3. Groups of enriched gene ontology (GO) terms for differentially expressed genes common to both trisomy 2 and tertiary trisomy 2.

Category GO term no. Description (Ontologya) p-value FDRb
Group I GO:0009814 defense response, incompatible interaction (P) 1.4E-25 8.8E-24
GO:0006955 immune response (P) 5.1E-10 8.6E-09
GO:0051704 multi-organism process (P) 1.1E-06 1.0E-05
GO:0006950 response to stress (P) 2.1E-05 1.6E-04
GO:0050896 response to stimulus (P) 9.9E-04 5.7E-03
GO:0016788 hydrolase activity, acting on ester bonds (F) 4.4E-03 4.5E-02
Group II GO:0050896 response to stimulus (P) 1.8E-25 2.0E-23
GO:0042221 response to chemical stimulus (P) 3.3E-24 3.0E-22
GO:0009725 response to hormone stimulus (P) 7.0E-17 3.5E-15
GO:0006950 response to stress (P) 2.5E-15 1.0E-13
GO:0006869 lipid transport (P) 5.8E-11 1.9E-09
GO:0006952 defense response (P) 8.6E-07 1.6E-05
GO:0019748 secondary metabolic process (P) 5.9E-06 1.0E-04
GO:0040007 growth (P) 5.5E-05 9.0E-04
GO:0006955 immune response (P) 1.4E-04 2.1E-03
GO:0003824 catalytic activity (F) 6.6E-04 3.1E-02
GO:0003700 transcription factor activity (F) 2.1E-03 4.3E-02
Group III GO:0007165 signal transduction (P) 3.3E-05 1.3E-03
GO:0006350 transcription (F) 3.4E-03 3.4E-02
GO:0005488 binding (F) 2.1E-03 3.8E-02
Group IV GO:0009733 response to auxin stimulus (P) 1.1E-08 3.5E-06
GO:0042221 response to chemical stimulus (P) 2.1E-04 2.5E-02
GO:0009725 response to hormone stimulus (P) 5.3E-04 3.3E-02
GO:0005975 carbohydrate metabolic process (P) 9.0E-04 4.6E-02

The gene ontology was analyzed by use of AgriGO [33].

a

Biological process (P); molecular function (F).

b

Chi-square statistical test; FDR, false discovery rate.

Because AAa is a tertiary trisomy 2 harboring a translocated chromosome 3 (Fig. 2B), we further examined the enriched GO terms present only in AAA or AAa (Table S2 in S1 File). In total, 471 and 1033 genes showed misregulated expression specifically in AAA and AAa, respectively (Fig. 4B). We found several GO cellular component terms related to organelles including plastid, mitochondrion, vacuole, endoplasmic reticulum, plasma membrane and cell wall were specifically enriched in AAa (Table S2 in S1 File). Furthermore, genes involved in several metabolic processes such as glycosinolate biosynthesis, sulfur metabolism, carbohydrate catabolism and metabolism were revealed among those misregulated specifically in AAa. Finally, GO terms related to biological process including cell cycle, cell death, proteolysis and chlorophyll metabolism were enriched only in AAa. The difference in specific gene sets misregulated in AAA and AAa likely results from the non-reciprocal translocation of Chr.3 to Chr.2 to generate the tertiary trisomy 2.

Trans effect of trisomy 2 and 5 on gene expression profiles

We next asked whether different trisomics would show a similar trans effect on changes of transcriptional signatures in Arabidopsis. By using the annotation enrichment tool (agriGO) we analyzed genes that were significantly misregulated (FDR<0.05) in the two trisomy 2 examples (AAA and AAa) and the trisomy 5, a primary trisomy with transcriptome data available [5]. Notably, we found GO terms related to response to stress and various types of endogenous and external stimuli and involved in catalytic activity were significantly enriched in both upregulated and downregulated groups of genes for all three trisomics (Fig. 5; Tables S3 and S4 in S1 File). Although several GO terms were commonly detected, misregulated genes in certain biological processes were specific to different trisomics. Genes involved in the flavonoid metabolic process and external encapsulating structure were upregulated and enriched only in trisomy 2 (AAA and AAa) but not trisomy 5 (Tables S3 and S4 in S1 File). Furthermore, genes related to transcription factor activity and DNA binding were upregulated and enriched only in primary trisomy 2 (AAA) and trisomy 5 but not tertiary trisomy 2 (AAa), while those involved in proteolysis, proteasome accessory complex, aging, cell death, cell cycle process, glucosinolate biosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism and catabolism were specifically enriched in AAa (Fig. 5; Tables S3 and S4 in S1 File). Moreover, we found significant enrichment of several catalytic activity terms only in AAa, including that of oxidoreductases, transferases, and kinases (Table S4 in S1 File). In contrast, genes involved in nucleolus, ribosomal biogenesis, translation, ncRNA metabolism, several developmental processes, organelle and photosynthesis were overrepresented only in trisomy 5 (Fig. 5; Tables S3 and S4 in S1 File). Our observations agree with previous studies showing downregulation of genes related to cell growth, metabolic processes and proliferation in aneuploid cells, and upregulation of those associated with stress responses in eukaryotic organisms, including yeast, mice and humans [14], [45]-[47].

Figure 5. Gene ontology (GO) terms enriched among the misregulated genes in three trisomic plants.

Figure 5

The specific enriched GO terms for up- and downregulated genes in AAA (white), AAa (black) and trisomy 5 (gray) were derived by use of agriGO [33]. The p values for GO terms are shown in –logarithmic scale. Data for trisomy 5 are from [5]. Complete lists are presented in Tables S3 and S4 in S1 File.

Nuclear-encoded genes related to organelles are misregulated in the trisomics

Large-scale chromosomal changes in aneuploidy are proposed to affect the biogenesis and depletion of organelles that cause energy consumption, proteotoxic and aneuploidy-associated stresses [8], [15], [48]. The status of genomic unbalance urges cells to consume energy to overcome the detrimental effects of genetic abnormality in aneuploidy [20]. The plastids and mitochondria are the energy sources in plant cells [49][52] and the peroxisomes are essential organelles mediating many important metabolic pathways [53]. To understand the effect of trisomy on cellular energy and metabolism in Arabidopsis, we examined the expression profiles of nuclear-encoded genes related to plastids, mitochondria and peroxisomes [5]. In the non-triplicated WT chromosomes, 10.1%, 4.6%, and 2.1% of genes account for functions related to plastids, mitochondria and peroxisomes, respectively (Table 4, Wild type). However, in the non-triplicated chromosomes of trisomy 2, tertiary trisomy 2, and trisomy 5, the number of plastid-related genes increased to 12.4%, 14.6%, and 18.7%, respectively (Table 4). Additionally, mis-expressed genes related to mitochondria and peroxisomes were overrepresented in the genomes of tertiary trisomy 2 and trisomy 5, but not in trisomy 2 (Table 4). Consistent with the analysis of enriched GO terms, the number of differentially expressed genes related to organelles important for cellular energy and metabolism were significantly increased in at least two of the three trisomics examined, which suggests that aneuploid cells altered the expression of genes involved in these organelles to adapt to energy stress resulting from the imbalanced genome.

Table 4. The number of organelle-related genes that are significantly misregulated to different degrees in trisomic genomes.

Gene number
Genome Plastidsd , e Mitochondriad , e Peroxisomesd , e
Genes on Chr.1, 3 (3’), 4, and 5a
Wild-type diploid 14916 1513 (10.1%) 691 (4.6%) 313 (2.1%)
Trisomy 2b 1394 173* (12.4%) 79 (5.7%) 38 (2.7%)
Tertiary trisomy 2b 1922 280** (14.6%) 112** (5.8%) 71** (3.7%)
Genes on Chr.1, 2, 3, and 4 a
Wild-type diploid 15030 1524 (10.1%) 710 (4.7%) 317 (2.1%)
Trisomy 5c 3584 669** (18.7%) 222** (6.2%) 125** (3.5%)
a

The probes matching multiple chromosomal locations are excluded.

b

Misregulated genes (p<0.05) on Chr.1, 3 (3’ end; behind the translocation breakpoint), 4, and 5.

c

Misregulated genes (p<0.05) on Chr.1, 2, 3, and 4; raw data from Huettel et al. (2008) [5].

d

The genes related to plastids, mitochondria, and peroxisomes are from Law et al. (2012) [70].

e

Chi-square test with Yates’ correction; two-tailed P value; *, p<0.05; **, p<0.01.

Discussion

Aneuploidy derived from T-DNA mutagenesis

Tertiary trisomy has been found in animals and plants and is considered to originate from the product of the malsegregation of interchange heterozygotes [2], [54]. Thus, the aur2-1/+ mutant may originate from a chromosome rearrangement that was likley induced by a T-DNA insertion event, followed by chromosome non-disjunction to become tertiary trisomy. However, with aur2-1/+, the malfunction of the T-DNA inserted gene may have increased the frequency of this phenomenon. AUR kinases play an important role in controlling the function of centrosomes, chromosome segregation and bipolar spindle assemble in yeast and mammalian cells [55][57]. Disruption in AtAUR2 by the T-DNA insertion (aur2-1) may cause missegregation of chromosomes during gametophyte development, thus leading to trisomy. However, the reduced fertility in aur2-1/+ does not seem to directly associate with the aur2-1 T-DNA insertion allele. We characterized another mutation in AtAUR2 (aur2-2, GK403B02) and found that aur2-2 was fertile in both male and female gametophytes, which is consistent with a previous report [21]. Therefore, the defect in transmission of aur2-1 allele from male or female gametes is associated with aur2-1/+ trisomy but not aur2-1 per se.

The results from array CGH showed increased signal intensity in chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes for both aur2-1/+ (AAa) and primary trisomy 2 (AAA) (Fig. 2B). The homologous sequences of mitochondrion on the extra copy of Chr.2 may have enhanced the signal intensity of mitochondrial sequences in the trisomics on array CGH [37], [38]. Alternatively, the enhanced probe signals may indicate increased contents of both organelles in aneuploid cells. In fact, several types of aneuploidy in Cyphomandra betacea showed a higher copy number of chloroplasts than the diploid WT [58]. Recent reports indicated that aneuploid cells show increased need for energy that may help overcome the detrimental effects of overproduced proteins from the extra copies of genes [14], [20]. Both chloroplasts and mitochondria are the energy sources of plant cells; their maintenance and operation highly depend on proteins translated from nuclear-encoded genes [49][52]. Changes in large-scale gene expression in the aneuploidy may affect the replication and operation of these two organelles. This finding was supported by the gene content analysis in the Arabidopsis genome [38]. More than 10% of the annotated genes on Chr.2 are functionally associated with chloroplasts and mitochondria [38]. Disturbing the balance of these nuclear-encoded genes may also lead to changes in number of these two organelles.

AAa genome is preferentially inherited in the offspring of tertiary trisomy 2

Trisomy produces various progeny with different karyotypes and does not exclusively generate trisomic offspring [16]. The tertiary trisomy 2 (AAa) was intentionally and stably maintained in generations by selecting the aur2-1 allele in this study. Because the aur2-1 allele was present only in heterozygosity, the aur2-1/+ trisomy could be simplex (Aaa) or duplex (AAa). In the process of meiosis (M I and M II, Fig. 6), the haploid tetrads carrying a chromatids are expected to be degraded in subsequent microgametogenesis [59], [60]. The duplex genome (AAa) will show a ratio of 2∶2 or 4∶0 for viable to non-viable pollen following the rule of independent assortment (Fig. 6A), and 3∶1 or 4∶0 if a crossing-over takes place (Fig. 6B). In contrast, the simplex genome (Aaa) is expected to generate 2∶2 and 1∶3 patterns in pollen tetrads. Thus, our observation supports that aur2-1/+ is a duplex (AAa) (Fig. 3F).

Figure 6. A Model of the genomic constitution of aur2-1/+ qrt2-1/qrt2-1 tetrads.

Figure 6

Meiosis without (A) or with crossing over (B). Left panel shows pollen mother cells and right panel, tetrads after meiosis. Chromosome 2 carrying the wild-type AUR2 (A) is shown in a blue line or the aur2-1 allele (a) with a translocation is indicated in a bold red line. M I, meiosis I; M II, meiosis II; shaded cells, aborted pollen grains.

An inheritance model by calculating the theoretical segregation ratio of progeny from self-fertilized aur2-1/+ (AAa) is shown in a Punnett square (Table S5 in S1 File). Among all possible combinations of progeny, the tetrasomics (AAAA, AAAa, and AAaa) would be rare because of the poor transmission of n+1 gametes [2], [16]. Reciprocal crosses showed no transmission of Aa or a from the male gametes (Table 1) and no a gametes from the female side (Table 2). Therefore, we found no trisomic (Aaa) or diploid (Aa and aa) progeny in the self-fertilized aur2-1/+ (Table S5 in S1 File, shaded boxes). Thus, 3 major types of progeny would be generated – AAA, AAa and AA (Table S5 in S1 File, white boxes). Theoretically, the number of trisomic progeny carrying genotypes AAA and AAa should be equivalent (AAA:AAa = (2/36+2/36): 4/36 = 1∶1). Because the male n+1 gametes (AA) were rarely transmitted [16], the expected ratio between the AAA and AAa offspring would be skewed and close to 1∶2 (AAA:AAa = 2/36∶4/36 = 1∶2). Surprisingly, we found 11∶72 and 4∶26 ratios of AAA:AAa in the progeny of self-fertilized aur2-1/+ and aur2-1/+ ovules crossed with WT pollen, respectively (Table 2); therefore, the AAa genome is preferentially inherited in the offspring of aur2-1/+. The preferential inheritance of the T-DNA insertion (aur2-1) may be due to its translocated chromosomal structure (Fig. 2B), which contains portions of Chr.2 and Chr.3, and will not be a perfect pairing partner to either one. The WT chromosomes may pair in higher frequency and ensure that each copy moves to the opposite poles in first division. If this is the case, the T-DNA carrying chromosome (a) is rarely alone and expected to accompanied by a normal chromosome (A) in one side [2].

Our findings suggest that the unique genomic structure of the tertiary trisomy 2 likely provided a selective advantage among progeny. Poor transmission of the T-DNA–inserted chromosome (a) in both male and female gametes resulted in limited genotypes in the offspring of self-fertilized aur2-1/+ (Table S5 in S1 File). Preferential inheritance from female gametes led to better survival of the T-DNA–carrying progeny (AAa) than the other trisomic offspring (AAA). Chromosome translocation is frequently associated with T-DNA insertion mutagenesis, about 19% [18]. Similar cases may show preferential inheritance in other chromosomal rearrangements resulting from T-DNA insertion. Chromosome non-disjunction may arise occasionally and thus led to tertiary trisomy. Further studies to investigate the occurrence of aneuploidy in the T-DNA insertion mutant library will be required to test this possibility.

Transcriptional consequences of aneuploidy in Arabidopsis

By using expression microarray analysis, we found a trans effect of triplicated genes on the diploid chromosomes to reveal genes involved in stress response, organelle-related functions, and transcription factors were misregulated and overrepresented in the trisomy (Fig. 5; Tables S2–S4 in S1 File). Our observations are consistent with previous reports of aneuploidy in plants and other organisms [5], [14], [42], [61]. Our analyses of the global gene expression profiles support a hypothesis that, regardless the type of trisomy, genes involved in stress response, defense response, energy and metabolism processes are significantly affected by aneuploid genomes. Previous studies showed increased transcription of environmental stress response (ESR)-like genes in all types of aneuploid cells in yeast [14], [62], plants [5], [61], mice and humans [14], [63]. The trans effect on gene expression may be attributed to regulatory proteins encoded by some of the triplicated genes to modulate concurrently on overlapping targets. Alternatively, the differential gene expression in aneuploid cells is a consequence, rather than the cause, of transcription failure.

Several specific GO terms were identified for misregulated genes in different trisomics. For example, the genes related to transcription were overrepresented in primary trisomics (trisomy 2 and trisomy 5) but not tertiary trisomy 2. In contrast, genes related to proteolysis, aging and cell death were significantly enriched in tertiary trisomy 2 but not the other primary trisomics. Furthermore, tertiary trisomy 2 seemed to show specific involvement in regulation of cell cycle regulation and carbohydrate metabolism. Mouse models of Down syndrome, Ts65Dn and Ts1Cje, show a connection between the high-grade aneuploidy and cellular alterations in protein degradation and aging [64]. The Ts65Dn mouse is a tertiary trisomy containing the distal region of mouse Chr.16 (92 genes homologous to nearly two-thirds of the human Chr.21) and Chr.17, whereas the Ts1Cje mouse carries a smaller region of mouse Chr.16 (67 genes homologous to the human Chr.21) and telomeric region of Chr.12. Both mouse models showed a combinational effect on phenotypes involving impaired protein homeostasis phenotype, such as cognitive abnormalities, age-related atrophy, degeneration of cholinergic neurons, age-related endosomal pathologies and protein misfolding [64]. Aneuploid cells may require more time to properly align chromosomes at metaphase. As a consequence of having extra chromosomes, tumor cells would be more prone to chromosome missegregation and aberrant in cell cycle progression because of checkpoint abrogation (reviewed in [48], [65]). Thus, the high-grade aneuploidy may affect additional genes located on other chromosomes, which combined with a gene dosage effect, influences gene expression patterns. Whether the genomic instability evoked by aneuploidy contributes to the affected plant phenotypes or such transcriptional changes are the result of differential growth fitness remains to be tested.

Taken together, the tertiary trisomy aur2-1/+ (AAa) has multiple traits: round leaves, aborted seeds, underdeveloped siliques with irregular size, defective ovule development, poor pollen viability, germination and pollen tube elongation, and abnormal pollen morphology. These phenotypes appeared to be caused by several factors. First, the most prominent round leaf phenotype was attributed to the effect of chromosomal imbalance by an extra Chr.2 [16]. In AAa, the extra chromosome contained ˜7 Mb chromosome 3S and the whole short arm 2S recombined with half of the long arm 2L (Fig. 2B and Figure S2 in S1 File). Large chromosomal deletion combined with translocation should affect more genes in AAa than AAA [66]. This possibility is supported by a previous report that the longer chromosomal component in the trisomic chromosome provided more profound morphological effect than the short one in tomato [67]. Second, the poor pollen viability and defective male gametophyte development may be caused by the translocated structure of the extra chromosome in aur2-1. Tertiary trisomy resulting in low pollen fertility was found in pearl millet ( ˜7%) [68] and lentil ( ˜9%) [69]. In mammals, most trisomy causes adverse effects on embryo development and is fatal to fetuses, leading to spontaneous abortion [8]. Finally, gene expression profiling provided useful information to compare and contrast the effects of different degrees of aneuploidy on plant cell physiology.

Supporting Information

S1 File

Figure S1, Seed development in self-fertilized and manually crossed aur2-1 /+. (A) Schematic representation of T-DNA insertion site in the AtAUR2 locus. The upstream region is shown as a line and exons as black boxes. The locations of primers (LP and RP) flanking AtAUR2 and T-DNA–specific primer (BP) are indicated by arrows. (B) Genotyping of wild type (Col-0) and aur2-1/+. G, PCR product amplified by LP and RP primers for wild type allele; T, amplification by BP and RP primers for T-DNA allele. (C) Seed development in the siliques of the self-fertilized wild type (Col-0), aur2-1/+ and F1 siliques from reciprocal crosses (female×male). Arrows indicate undeveloped seeds. Scale bar, 200 µm. Figure S2, Translocation breakpoints of the tertiary trisomy 2 ( aur2-1 /+; AAa ). (A) A zoom-in diagram from the shaded region of the chromosome 2 in the Figure 2A. The translocation breakpoint is mapped within the shaded region in pink. The moving average of the ratio of signal intensities in 2 trisomy genomes is shown. (B) Locations of the AUR2 locus (At2g25880) with a T-DNA insertion (inverted triangle) and adjacent annotated genes within the shaded region in (A) (upper panel). Locations of annotated genes and translocation breakpoint (arrow) on the chromosome 3 (lower panel). Figure S3, Pollen germination and embryo development in tertiary trisomy 2. (A) Pollen grains from aur2-1/+ show impaired pollen germination and pollen tube growth. The in vitro pollen germination of pollen grains from the wild type (Col-0) and aur2-1/+ were scored by microscopy and measured by use of ImageJ after 8-h incubation in germination agar medium. Data are mean±SD from 3 independent experiments (n = 400 ˜500). (B) Representative differential interference contrast (DIC) images of developing embryos in wild type (Col-0) and tertiary trisomy 2 (aur2-1/+; AAa) whose ovules were both manually pollinated by WT pollen. Quantitative data of the embryos at 6 days after pollination (DAP) are shown. Scale bar, 100 µm. Figure S4, M(A) plots of the intensity differences between the trisomics and WT. (A) M(A) plot of trisomy 2; (B) M(A) plot of tertiary trisomy 2. The M values (log2 ratios) of the trisomy 2 and wild type (Col-0) are represented in the y-axis and the A values (the average expression) between the trisomics are represented in the x-axis. Red and blue dots, entities of the triplicated chromosomes; black dots, entities of other non-triplicated chromosomes; purple and orange lines, moving average. Upper and lower lines of the purple or orange lines, moving average ± SD. Sufficiently strongly expressed transcripts (the dots to the right of the dash lines) were isolated to perform the transcriptional signature analysis in this study. The methodology of data analysis is from Huettel et al. (2008) [5]. Table S1, The ratio of undeveloped seeds in the progeny of self-fertilized and manual crosses of aur2-1 /+ and wild-type (Col-0) plants. Table S2, Enriched gene ontology (GO) terms of genes that are misregulated specifically in the trisomy 2 or tertiary trisomy 2. Table S3, Enriched GO terms of significantly upregulated genes in the trisomy 2, tertiary trisomy 2, and trisomy 5. Table S4, Enriched GO terms of significantly downregulated genes in the trisomy 2, tertiary trisomy 2, and trisomy 5.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

This research was funded in part by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (NSC 101-2311-B-001-029-MY3) and Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, to WSL. We thank ABRC, NASC and the Salk Institute for seeds and T-DNA lines. We are grateful for Dr. Guang-Yuh Jauh and Mr. Kuan-Chieh Leu for providing reagents and protocol for the pollen germination assay. We thank the assistance of Drs. Wann-Neng Jane and Wen-Dar Lin in the Cell Biology and Bioinformatics Core Facilities, respectively, at Academia Sinica. We appreciate Ms. Laura Smales for editing the manuscript.

Data Availability

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. Data are available from Array CGH (accession nos. GSM980297, GSM980298 and GSM980299) and Gene Expression Affymetrix ATH1 (accession no. GSE54827).

Funding Statement

This research was funded in part by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (NSC 101-2311-B-001-029-MY3) and Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, to WSL. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Henry IM, Dilkes BP, Miller ES, Burkart-Waco D, Comai L (2010) Phenotypic consequences of aneuploidy in Arabidopsis thaliana . Genetics 186:1231–1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Singh RJ (1993) Plant cytogenetics. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 391 p. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hassold T, Hunt P (2001) To err (meiotically) is human: The genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet 2:280–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Megarbane A, Ravel A, Mircher C, Sturtz F, Grattau Y, et al. (2009) The 50th anniversary of the discovery of trisomy 21: the past, present, and future of research and treatment of Down syndrome. Genet Med 11:611–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Huettel B, Kreil DP, Matzke M, Matzke AJM (2008) Effects of aneuploidy on genome structure, expression, and interphase organization in Arabidopsis thaliana . PLoS Genet 4:e1000226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Matzke MA, Moscone EA, Park YD, Papp I, Oberkofler H, et al. (1994) Inheritance and expression of a transgene insert in an aneuploid tobacco line. Mol Gen Genet 245:471–485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Papp I, Iglesias VA, Moscone EA, Michalowski S, Spiker S, et al. (1996) Structural instability of a transgene locus in tobacco is associated with aneuploidy. Plant J 10:469–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Siegel JJ, Amon A (2012) New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 28:189–214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Gordon DJ, Resio B, Pellman D (2012) Causes and consequences of aneuploidy in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 13:189–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Storchova Z (2012) The Causes and Consequences of Aneuploidy in Eukaryotic Cells. In: Storchova Z, editor. Aneuploidy in Health and Disease: InTech.
  • 11. McGranahan N, Burrell RA, Endesfelder D, Novelli MR, Swanton C (2012) Cancer chromosomal instability: therapeutic and diagnostic challenges. EMBO Rep 13:528–538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Matzke MA, Mette MF, Kanno T, Matzke AJM (2003) Does the intrinsic instability of aneuploid genomes have a causal role in cancer? Trends Genet 19:253–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sheltzer JM, Amon A (2011) The aneuploidy paradox: costs and benefits of an incorrect karyotype. Trends Genet 27:446–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sheltzer JM, Torres EM, Dunham MJ, Amon A (2012) Transcriptional consequences of aneuploidy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:12644–12649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Pfau SJ, Amon A (2012) Chromosomal instability and aneuploidy in cancer: from yeast to man. EMBO Rep 13:515–527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Koornneef M, der Veen JHV (1983) Trisomics in Arabidopsis thaliana and the location of linkage groups. Genetica 61:41–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. O’Malley RC, Ecker JR (2010) Linking genotype to phenotype using the Arabidopsis unimutant collection. Plant J 61:928–940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Clark KA, Krysan PJ (2010) Chromosomal translocations are a common phenomenon in Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA insertion lines. Plant J 64:990–1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ohba T, Yoshioka Y, Machida C, Machida Y (1995) DNA rearrangement associated with the integration of T-DNA in tobacco: an example for multiple duplications of DNA around the integration target. Plant J 7:157–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tang YC, Amon A (2013) Gene copy-number alterations: a cost-benefit analysis. Cell 152:394–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Van Damme D, De Rybel B, Gudesblat G, Demidov D, Grunewald W, et al. (2011) Arabidopsis alpha Aurora kinases function in formative cell division plane orientation. Plant Cell 23:4013–4024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y (1970) Evaluation of pollen viability by enzymatically induced fluorescence; intracellular hydrolysis of fluorescein diacetate. Stain Technol 45:115–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Fan LM, Wang YF, Wang H, Wu WH (2001) In vitro Arabidopsis pollen germination and characterization of the inward potassium currents in Arabidopsis pollen grain protoplasts. J Exp Bot 52:1603–1614. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Park SK, Howden R, Twell D (1998) The Arabidopsis thaliana gametophytic mutation gemini pollen1 disrupts microspore polarity, division asymmetry and pollen cell fate. Development 125:3789–3799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alvarez-Buylla ER, Benítez M, Corvera-Poiré A, Chaos Cador Á, de Folter S, et al. (2010) Flower development. The Arabidopsis Book: e0127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 26. Boisnard-Lorig C, Colon-Carmona A, Bauch M, Hodge S, Doerner P, et al. (2001) Dynamic analyses of the expression of the HISTONE::YFP fusion protein in Arabidopsis show that syncytial endosperm is divided in mitotic domains. Plant Cell 13:495–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ross KJ, Fransz P, Jones GH (1996) A light microscopic atlas of meiosis in Arabidopsis thaliana . Chromosome Res 4:507–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Chang YC, Shii CT, Chung MC (2009) Variations in ribosomal RNA gene loci in spider lily (Lycoris spp.). J Am Soc Hortic Sci 134:567–573. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Chung MC, Lee YI, Cheng YY, Chou YJ, Lu CF (2008) Chromosomal polymorphism of ribosomal genes in the genus Oryza. Theor Appl Genet 116:745–753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Kent WJ (2002) BLAT - The BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res 12:656–664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Wu Z, Irizarry RA, Gentleman R, Martinez-Murillo F, Spencer F (2004) A Model-Based Background Adjustment for Oligonucleotide Expression Arrays. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99:909–917. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Huber W, von Heydebreck A, Sültmann H, Poustka A, Vingron M (2002) Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics 18:S96–S104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Du Z, Zhou X, Ling Y, Zhang Z, Su Z (2010) agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res 38:W64–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Sears LMS, Lee-Chen S (1970) Cytogenetic studies in Arabidopsis thaliana . Can J Genet Cytol 12:217–223. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Koornneef M, Fransz P, de Jong H (2003) Cytogenetic tools for Arabidopsis thaliana . Chromosome Res 11:183–194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Kosterin OE, Galieva ER, Bogdanova VS (2009) The first record of tetrasomy in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica 166:109–121. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Stupar RM, Lilly JW, Town CD, Cheng Z, Kaul S, et al. (2001) Complex mtDNA constitutes an approximate 620-kb insertion on Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 2: implication of potential sequencing errors caused by large-unit repeats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98:5099–5103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Lin X, Kaul S, Rounsley S, Shea TP, Benito MI, et al. (1999) Sequence and analysis of chromosome 2 of the plant Arabidopsis thaliana . Nature 402:761–768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Drews GN, Lee D, Christensen CA (1998) Genetic analysis of female gametophyte development and function. Plant Cell 10:5–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Preuss D, Rhee SY, Davis RW (1994) Tetrad analysis possible in Arabidopsis with mutation of the QUARTET (QRT) genes. Science 264:1458–1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Copenhaver GP, Keith KC, Preuss D (2000) Tetrad analysis in higher plants. A budding technology. Plant Physiol 124:7–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Birchler JA, Veitia RA (2007) The gene balance hypothesis: from classical genetics to modern genomics. Plant Cell 19:395–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Birchler JA, Veitia RA (2010) The gene balance hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits and evolution. New Phytol 186:54–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Birchler JA, Veitia RA (2014) The Gene Balance Hypothesis: dosage effects in plants. Methods Mol Biol 1112:25–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Sheltzer JM (2013) A transcriptional and metabolic signature of primary aneuploidy is present in chromosomally unstable cancer cells and informs clinical prognosis. Cancer Res 73:6401–6412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sheltzer JM, Blank HM, Pfau SJ, Tange Y, George BM, et al. (2011) Aneuploidy drives genomic instability in yeast. Science 333:1026–1030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Williams BR, Prabhu VR, Hunter KE, Glazier CM, Whittaker CA, et al. (2008) Aneuploidy affects proliferation and spontaneous immortalization in mammalian cells. Science 322:703–709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Oromendia AB, Amon A (2014) Aneuploidy: implications for protein homeostasis and disease. Dis Model Mech 7:15–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Mackenzie S, McIntosh L (1999) Higher plant mitochondria. Plant Cell 11:571–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Pogson BJ, Woo NS, Forster B, Small ID (2008) Plastid signalling to the nucleus and beyond. Trends Plant Sci 13:602–609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Liere K, Weihe A, Borner T (2011) The transcription machineries of plant mitochondria and chloroplasts: Composition, function, and regulation. J Plant Physiol 168:1345–1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Eberhard S, Drapier D, Wollman FA (2002) Searching limiting steps in the expression of chloroplast-encoded proteins: relations between gene copy number, transcription, transcript abundance and translation rate in the chloroplast of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii . Plant J 31:149–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zhang X, Shiu SH, Cal A, Borevitz JO (2008) Global analysis of genetic, epigenetic and transcriptional polymorphisms in Arabidopsis thaliana using whole genome tiling arrays. PLoS Genet 4:e1000032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Braddock SR, Henley KM, Potter KL, Nguyen HG, Huang THM (2000) Tertiary trisomy due to a reciprocal translocation of chromosomes 5 and 21 in a four-generation family. Am J Med Genet 92:311–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Chan CSM, Botstein D (1993) Isolation and characterization of chromosome-gain and increase-in-ploidy mutants in yeast. Genetics 135:677–691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Bischoff JR, Anderson L, Zhu YF, Mossie K, Ng L, et al. (1998) A homologue of Drosophila aurora kinase is oncogenic and amplified in human colorectal cancers. EMBO J 17:3052–3065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Fu JY, Bian ML, Jiang Q, Zhang CM (2007) Roles of aurora kinases in mitosis and tumorigenesis. Mol Cancer Res 5:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Standring LS, Pringle GJ, Murray BG (1990) The control of chloroplast number in Solanum muricatum Ait. and Cyphomandra betacea (Cav.) Sendt. and its value as an indicator of polyploidy. Euphytica 47:71–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Chen YCS, McCormick S (1996) Sidecar pollen, an Arabidopsis thaliana male gametophytic mutant with aberrant cell divisions during pollen development. Development 122:3243–3253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Cai XW, Xu SS (2007) Meiosis-driven genome variation in plants. Curr Genomics 8:151–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Makarevitch I, Harris C (2010) Aneuploidy causes tissue-specific qualitative changes in global gene expression patterns in maize. Plant Physiol 152:927–938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Torres EM, Sokolsky T, Tucker CM, Chan LY, Boselli M, et al. (2007) Effects of aneuploidy on cellular physiology and cell division in haploid yeast. Science 317:916–924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Oromendia AB, Dodgson SE, Amon A (2012) Aneuploidy causes proteotoxic stress in yeast. Genes Dev 26:2696–2708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Cataldo AM, Petanceska S, Peterhoff CM, Terio NB, Epstein CJ, et al. (2003) App gene dosage modulates endosomal abnormalities of Alzheimer’s disease in a segmental trisomy 16 mouse model of down syndrome. J Neurosci 23:6788–6792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Manchado E, Guillamot M, Malumbres M (2012) Killing cells by targeting mitosis. Cell Death Differ 19:369–377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Vizir IY, Mulligan BJ (1999) Genetics of gamma-irradiation-induced mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana: large chromosomal deletions can be rescued through the fertilization of diploid eggs. J Hered 90:412–417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Khush GS, Rick CM (1967) Tomato tertiary trisomics - origin, identification, morphology and use in determining poiition of centromeres and arm location of markers. Can J Genet Cytol 9:610–631. [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Kumar RS, Singh UP, Singh RM, Singh RB (1985) Tertiary trisomics and their use in pearl millet improvement. Cytologia 50:433–443. [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Ladizinsky G, Weeden NF, Muehlbauer FJ (1990) Tertiary trisomics in lentil. Euphytica 51:179–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Law SR, Narsai R, Taylor NL, Delannoy E, Carrie C, et al. (2012) Nucleotide and RNA metabolism prime translational initiation in the earliest events of mitochondrial biogenesis during Arabidopsis germination. Plant Physiol 158:1610–1627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 File

Figure S1, Seed development in self-fertilized and manually crossed aur2-1 /+. (A) Schematic representation of T-DNA insertion site in the AtAUR2 locus. The upstream region is shown as a line and exons as black boxes. The locations of primers (LP and RP) flanking AtAUR2 and T-DNA–specific primer (BP) are indicated by arrows. (B) Genotyping of wild type (Col-0) and aur2-1/+. G, PCR product amplified by LP and RP primers for wild type allele; T, amplification by BP and RP primers for T-DNA allele. (C) Seed development in the siliques of the self-fertilized wild type (Col-0), aur2-1/+ and F1 siliques from reciprocal crosses (female×male). Arrows indicate undeveloped seeds. Scale bar, 200 µm. Figure S2, Translocation breakpoints of the tertiary trisomy 2 ( aur2-1 /+; AAa ). (A) A zoom-in diagram from the shaded region of the chromosome 2 in the Figure 2A. The translocation breakpoint is mapped within the shaded region in pink. The moving average of the ratio of signal intensities in 2 trisomy genomes is shown. (B) Locations of the AUR2 locus (At2g25880) with a T-DNA insertion (inverted triangle) and adjacent annotated genes within the shaded region in (A) (upper panel). Locations of annotated genes and translocation breakpoint (arrow) on the chromosome 3 (lower panel). Figure S3, Pollen germination and embryo development in tertiary trisomy 2. (A) Pollen grains from aur2-1/+ show impaired pollen germination and pollen tube growth. The in vitro pollen germination of pollen grains from the wild type (Col-0) and aur2-1/+ were scored by microscopy and measured by use of ImageJ after 8-h incubation in germination agar medium. Data are mean±SD from 3 independent experiments (n = 400 ˜500). (B) Representative differential interference contrast (DIC) images of developing embryos in wild type (Col-0) and tertiary trisomy 2 (aur2-1/+; AAa) whose ovules were both manually pollinated by WT pollen. Quantitative data of the embryos at 6 days after pollination (DAP) are shown. Scale bar, 100 µm. Figure S4, M(A) plots of the intensity differences between the trisomics and WT. (A) M(A) plot of trisomy 2; (B) M(A) plot of tertiary trisomy 2. The M values (log2 ratios) of the trisomy 2 and wild type (Col-0) are represented in the y-axis and the A values (the average expression) between the trisomics are represented in the x-axis. Red and blue dots, entities of the triplicated chromosomes; black dots, entities of other non-triplicated chromosomes; purple and orange lines, moving average. Upper and lower lines of the purple or orange lines, moving average ± SD. Sufficiently strongly expressed transcripts (the dots to the right of the dash lines) were isolated to perform the transcriptional signature analysis in this study. The methodology of data analysis is from Huettel et al. (2008) [5]. Table S1, The ratio of undeveloped seeds in the progeny of self-fertilized and manual crosses of aur2-1 /+ and wild-type (Col-0) plants. Table S2, Enriched gene ontology (GO) terms of genes that are misregulated specifically in the trisomy 2 or tertiary trisomy 2. Table S3, Enriched GO terms of significantly upregulated genes in the trisomy 2, tertiary trisomy 2, and trisomy 5. Table S4, Enriched GO terms of significantly downregulated genes in the trisomy 2, tertiary trisomy 2, and trisomy 5.

(PDF)

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. Data are available from Array CGH (accession nos. GSM980297, GSM980298 and GSM980299) and Gene Expression Affymetrix ATH1 (accession no. GSE54827).


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES