Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Q. 2009 Oct 14;90(5):1051–1071. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00645.x

Table 3.

Conditional Logistic Regression Model Estimating the Probability of Depression

Model 1 Model 2 Model 3

Beta
Odds Ratio
SE Beta
Odds Ratio
SE Beta
Odds Ratio
SE
Material Hardship
Lack of medical care 0.287 0.253 0.240 0.256
1.332 1.271
Free food 0.168 0.216 0.191 0.217
1.182 1.211
Phone turned off 0.398*** 0.160 0.377** 0.161
1.489 1.459
Unstable housing 0.133 0.189 0.135 0.190
1.142 1.145
Problems paying bills 0.596*** 0.163 0.590*** 0.164
1.816 1.803
Income to needs ratio
1.0 to <1.5a 0.069 0.189 0.059 0.196
1.072 1.060
1.5 to <2.0a 0.296 0.246 0.273 0.251
1.345 1.313
2.0 to <4.0a −0.081 0.241 −0.042 0.250
0.922 0.959
≥4.0a −0.801** 0.401 −0.688* 0.414
0.449 0.502
Demographic Controls
High school diplomab −0.330 0.526 −0.373 0.516 −0.425 0.531
0.719 0.689 0.654
More than high schoolb −0.692 0.574 −0.773 0.564 −0.774 0.577
0.501 0.462 0.461
Number of children 0.219** 0.098 0.234** 0.098 0.227** 0.099
1.245 1.264 1.254
Age of youngest child −0.049 0.064 −0.032 0.065 −0.034 0.066
0.952 0.968 0.967
Poor/Fair self-reported health 0.628*** 0.180 0.703*** 0.174 0.660*** 0.181
1.874 2.019 1.936
Age of householder 0.239*** 0.059 0.243*** 0.058 0.240*** 0.060
1.269 1.275 1.271
Marriedc 0.869 0.671 0.937 0.673 0.813 0.677
2.386 2.552 2.255
Widowed/separated/divorced c 1.562** 0.774 1.910*** 0.768 1.526** 0.779
4.766 6.753 4.600
Panel sample size 1282 1282 1282

NOTE:

***

indicates significant at .01;

**

indicates significant at .05;

*

indicates significant at .10

a

The omitted reference group is those with income to needs ratios <1.0;

b

The omitted reference group is less than high school;

c

The omitted reference group is never married.