Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 17.

Published in final edited form as: Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008 Apr 20;475(2):93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.04.014

Fig. 4 — Histograms of the kinetic parameters of ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylation (a and c) and methoxyresorufin-O-demethylation (b and d) by BTC1A2_POR membranes, in absence or presence of 10 μM FAD. The affinity constant (K_m) of CYP1A2 for ethoxyresorufin and methoxyresorufin are presented in a and b, respectively. The turnover number (k_cat) of CYP1A2 for ethoxyresorufin and methoxyresorufin are presented in c and d, respectively (All K_m and k_cat values represented standard deviations (error-bars)< 10%, see Supplemental Table 1)

Fig. 4 — Histograms of the kinetic parameters of ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylation (a and c) and methoxyresorufin-O-demethylation (b and d) by BTC1A2_POR membranes, in absence or presence of 10 μM FAD. The affinity constant (K_m) of CYP1A2 for ethoxyresorufin and methoxyresorufin are presented in a and b, respectively. The turnover number (k_cat) of CYP1A2 for ethoxyresorufin and methoxyresorufin are presented in c and d, respectively (All K_m and k_cat values represented standard deviations (error-bars)< 10%, see Supplemental Table 1)