Table 10.

Prospective hierarchical regressions, predicting direct and indirect aggression and victimization at T2 from SDQ psychological difficulties at T1 ^a

Variables		R 2 Δ	B	SE B	ß	F-step
Predicting Direct Aggression at T2 from SDQ subscales at T1
Step 1		.30				188.4***
Gender			0.02	0.01	.09**
Direct Aggression			0.60	0.03	.52***
Step 2		.02				14.0***
Gender			0.02	0.01	.08*
T1 Direct Aggression			0.51	0.04	.44***
T1 Emotional Symptoms			−0.00	0.00	−.04
T1 Conduct Problems			0.01	0.01	.17***
Predicting Indirect Aggression at T2 from SDQ subscales at T1
Step 1		.31				195.3***
Gender			−0.01	0.01	−.05
Indirect Aggression			0.65	0.03	.55***
Step 2		.01				6.2**
Gender			−0.02	0.01	−.06*
T1 Indirect Aggression			0.58	0.03	.51***
T1 Emotional Symptoms			−0.00	0.00	−.01
T1 Conduct Problems			0.01	0.00	.11***
Predicting Direct Victimization at T2 from SDQ subscales at T1
Step 1		.29				179.7***
Gender			0.01	0.01	.02
Victim of Direct Aggression			0.56	0.03	.54***
Step 2		.02				6.7***
Gender			0.01	0.01	.04
T1 Victim of Direct Aggression			0.50	0.03	.48***
T1 Emotional Symptoms			0.01	0.00	.07*
T1 Conduct Problems			0.01	0.00	.08**
Predicting Indirect Victimization at T2 from SDQ subscales at T1
Step 1		.36				249.6***
Gender			−0.03	0.01	−.08**
Victim of Indirect Aggression			0.61	0.03	.58***
Step 2		.02				8.9***
Gender			−0.02	0.01	−.07*
T1 Victim of Indirect Aggression			0.54	0.03	.52***
T1 Emotional Symptoms			0.01	0.00	.08**
T1 Conduct Problems			0.01	0.00	.08**

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.

^aNo results from Step 3 are reported because no significant effects were found.