Table 8.
Variables | R 2 Δ | B | SE B | ß | F-step | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Predicting SDQ Emotional Symptoms at T2 from Direct and Indirect Aggression at T1 | ||||||
Step 1 | .39 | 281.5*** | ||||
Gender | −0.95 | 0.12 | −.22*** | |||
T1 Emotional Symptoms | 0.53 | 0.03 | .52*** | |||
Step 2 | .00 | 1.2 | ||||
Gender | −0.88 | 0.13 | −.21*** | |||
T1 Emotional Symptoms | 0.53 | 0.03 | .52*** | |||
T1 Direct Aggression | −0.78 | 0.63 | −.04 | |||
T1 Indirect Aggression | 0.89 | 0.60 | .05 | |||
Predicting SDQ Conduct Problems at T2 from Direct and Indirect Aggression at T1 | ||||||
Step 1 | .25 | 151.3*** | ||||
Gender | 0.20 | 0.10 | .06 | |||
T1 Conduct Problems | 0.52 | 0.03 | .50*** | |||
Step 2 | .02 | 13.8*** | ||||
Gender | 0.13 | 0.10 | .04 | |||
T1 Conduct Problems | 0.43 | 0.04 | .41*** | |||
T1 Direct Aggression | 2.15 | 0.59 | .15*** | |||
T1 Indirect Aggression | 0.56 | 0.52 | .04 | |||
Step 3 | .01 | 4.5* | ||||
Gender | 0.05 | 0.14 | .02 | |||
T1 Conduct Problems | 0.43 | 0.03 | .41*** | |||
T1 Direct Aggression | −2.88 | 1.79 | −.20 | |||
T1 Indirect Aggression | 3.69 | 1.58 | .26* | |||
T1 Direct Aggression × Gender | 3.29 | 1.10 | .40** | |||
T1 Indirect Aggression × Gender | −2.16 | 1.04 | −.25* |
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.
aResults from Step 3 are only reported where significant effects were found.