Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 12;2(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40359-014-0043-2

Table 8.

Prospective hierarchical regressions, predicting SDQ psychological difficulties at T2 from direct and indirect aggression at T1 a

Variables R 2 Δ B SE B ß F-step
Predicting SDQ Emotional Symptoms at T2 from Direct and Indirect Aggression at T1
Step 1 .39 281.5***
 Gender −0.95 0.12 −.22***
 T1 Emotional Symptoms 0.53 0.03 .52***
Step 2 .00 1.2
 Gender −0.88 0.13 −.21***
 T1 Emotional Symptoms 0.53 0.03 .52***
 T1 Direct Aggression −0.78 0.63 −.04
 T1 Indirect Aggression 0.89 0.60 .05
Predicting SDQ Conduct Problems at T2 from Direct and Indirect Aggression at T1
Step 1 .25 151.3***
 Gender 0.20 0.10 .06
 T1 Conduct Problems 0.52 0.03 .50***
Step 2 .02 13.8***
 Gender 0.13 0.10 .04
 T1 Conduct Problems 0.43 0.04 .41***
 T1 Direct Aggression 2.15 0.59 .15***
 T1 Indirect Aggression 0.56 0.52 .04
Step 3 .01 4.5*
 Gender 0.05 0.14 .02
 T1 Conduct Problems 0.43 0.03 .41***
 T1 Direct Aggression −2.88 1.79 −.20
 T1 Indirect Aggression 3.69 1.58 .26*
 T1 Direct Aggression × Gender 3.29 1.10 .40**
 T1 Indirect Aggression × Gender −2.16 1.04 −.25*

*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.

aResults from Step 3 are only reported where significant effects were found.