Table 2.

Hypotheses Proposed by This Study

Hypothesis

1-1. Clinical factors will have a positive effect on the PU.

1-2. Clinical factors will have a positive effect on the ATT.

1-3. Nonclinical factors will have a positive effect on the PU.

1-4. Nonclinical factors will have a positive effect on the ATT.

2-1. The EMT's SN will have a positive effect on the PU.

2-2. The EMT's SN will have a positive effect on the ATT.

2-3. The EMT's EC will have a positive effect on the PU.

2-4. The EMT's EC will have a positive effect on the ATT.

3-1. LI will have a positive effect on the PU.

3-2. LI will have a positive effect on the ATT.

3-3. The EMT's JF will have a positive effect on the PU.

3-4. The EMT's JF will have a positive effect on the ATT.

3-5. The EMT's OF will have a positive effect on the PU.

3-6. The EMT's OF will have a positive effect on the ATT.

4-1. The EMT's PEOU will have positive effects on the PU.

4-2. The EMT's PEOU will have positive effects on the ATT.

5-1. The EMT's PU will have positive effects on the ATT.

5-2. The EMT's PU will have positively effects on the UI.

6. The EMT's ATT will have positive effects on the UI.

ATT, attitude; EC, expectation confirmation; EMT, emergency medical technician; JF, job fit; LI, loyalty incentives; OF, organizational facilitation, PEOU, perceived ease of use; PU, perceived usefulness; SN, subjective norm; UI, use intention.