Yalçin 2002.
Methods | Study design: randomized, parallel‐group study Conditions included: chronic posterior blepharitis Enrollment: 40 participants Exclusions and loss to follow‐up: none reported Study follow‐up: 4 months |
|
Participants | Country: Turkey Age: mean 43 years Gender: 12 men and 28 women Inclusion criteria: patients with chronic posterior blepharitis visiting SSK Okmeydani Education Hospital's Eye Clinic |
|
Interventions | Therapy group (43 eyes of 22 participants): 100 mg oral NAC 3 times a day for 8 weeks, plus control treatment Control group (36 eyes of 18 participants): topical steroids (prednisone acetate) and antibiotics (tobramycin sulfate) 4 times daily for 4 weeks, plus warm compresses twice daily for 2 months and artificial tears (polyvidone) 4 times daily for 3 months |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes:
1) Schirmer‐1 test increase rate between groups
2) fluorescein BUT increase rate between groups
3) mucus fern test increase rate between groups
4) adverse events Measurements taken at baseline and weekly for 4 months Unit of analysis: the individual (average of both eyes) |
|
Notes | Study dates: not reported Funding source: not reported Declarations of interest: none reported Publication language: English |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of randomization not reported. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of allocation concealment not reported. |
Masking (performance bias and detection bias) Were participants masked to treatment group? | High risk | Participants could not be masked to differences in treatment groups. |
Masking (performance bias and detection bias) Were healthcare providers masked to treatment group? | High risk | Masking not reported. |
Masking (performance bias and detection bias) Were outcome assessors masked to treatment group? | High risk | Masking not reported. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | ITT analysis was followed. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Results were reported for primary and secondary outcomes. |
Other bias | Low risk |