Skip to main content
. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD005556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005556.pub2

Yalçin 2002.

Methods Study design: randomized, parallel‐group study
Conditions included: chronic posterior blepharitis
Enrollment: 40 participants 
Exclusions and loss to follow‐up: none reported
Study follow‐up: 4 months
Participants Country: Turkey
Age: mean 43 years
Gender: 12 men and 28 women
Inclusion criteria: patients with chronic posterior blepharitis visiting SSK Okmeydani Education Hospital's Eye Clinic
Interventions Therapy group (43 eyes of 22 participants): 100 mg oral NAC 3 times a day for 8 weeks, plus control treatment
Control group (36 eyes of 18 participants): topical steroids (prednisone acetate) and antibiotics (tobramycin sulfate) 4 times daily for 4 weeks, plus warm compresses twice daily for 2 months and artificial tears (polyvidone) 4 times daily for 3 months
Outcomes Primary outcomes: 
 1) Schirmer‐1 test increase rate between groups 
 2) fluorescein BUT increase rate between groups 
 3) mucus fern test increase rate between groups 
 4) adverse events
Measurements taken at baseline and weekly for 4 months
Unit of analysis: the individual (average of both eyes)
Notes Study dates: not reported
Funding source: not reported
Declarations of interest: none reported
Publication language: English
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of randomization not reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of allocation concealment not reported.
Masking (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Were participants masked to treatment group? High risk Participants could not be masked to differences in treatment groups.
Masking (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Were healthcare providers masked to treatment group? High risk Masking not reported.
Masking (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Were outcome assessors masked to treatment group? High risk Masking not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk ITT analysis was followed.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Results were reported for primary and secondary outcomes.
Other bias Low risk