Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 18.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 29;8:CD005139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005139.pub3
Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Gain of 15 letters or more visual acuity at one year 6 2446 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.90 [0.73, 1.11]
2 Gain of 15 letters or more visual acuity at two years 2 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
 2.1 Participants in groups as randomized at baseline 2 1547 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.84 [0.64, 1.11]
 2.2 Participants remaining in same groups after re-randomization 2 1295 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.84 [0.64, 1.11]
3 Loss of fewer than 15 letters visual acuity at one year 6 2446 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.98, 1.02]
4 Loss of fewer than 15 letters visual acuity at two years 2 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
 4.1 Participants in groups as randomized at baseline 2 1547 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.97 [0.94, 1.00]
 4.2 Participants remaining in same groups after re-randomization 2 1295 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.94, 1.01]
5 Visual acuity better than 20/200 at one year 4 2026 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.96, 1.01]
6 Visual acuity better than 20/200 at two years 2 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
 6.1 Participants in groups as randomized at baseline 2 1547 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.95, 1.06]
 6.2 Participants remaining in same groups after re-randomization 2 1295 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 1.01 [0.95, 1.06]
7 Mean change in visual acuity at one year (number of letters) 6 2446 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) −0.51 [−1.64, 0.62]
8 Mean change in visual acuity at two years (number of letters) 2 1295 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) −1.15 [−2.82, 0.51]
9 Reduction in central retinal thickness at one year 4 1995 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) −13.97 [−26.52, −1.
10 Reduction in central retinal thickness at two years 2 1199 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) −12.40 [−33.83, 9.
11 No problems in quality of life domain at one year 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
 11.1 Mobility 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 11.2 Self care 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 11.3 Usual activities 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 11.4 Pain/discomfort 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 11.5 Anxiety/depression 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
12 No problems in quality of life domain at two years 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
 12.1 Mobility 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 12.2 Self care 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 12.3 Usual activities 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 12.4 Pain/discomfort 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
 12.5 Anxiety/depression 1 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]