Table 1. TF comparison for I-SDREM and MT-SDREM.
H1N1 & H3N2 & H5N1 | H1N1 & H3N2 | H3N2 & H5N1 | H1N1 & H5N1 | ||||
I | MT | I | MT | I | MT | I | MT |
AR | AR | IRF1 | IRF1 | AHR◊ | EP300 | ATF2 | |
BRCA1 | BRCA1 | IRF3 | IRF3 | JUN | RELA◊ | HIF1A | |
ESR1 | ESR1 | FOSL2 | FOSL2 | PPARG | TP53 | STAT3 | |
STAT1 | STAT1 | CEPBA | IRF5 | RB1 | |||
CEBPA | NR3C1◊ | TFAP2A | SMAD4 | ||||
EP300 | SMAD3◊ | SOX9 | |||||
JUN | |||||||
PPARG | |||||||
RB1 | |||||||
SMAD4 | |||||||
SOX9 | |||||||
TP53 |
TFs predicted to regulate two or all three response networks. Each set of conditions is divided to two columns with the first column containing TFs at the intersection of the SDREM output for the conditions and the second the MT-SDREM results for these conditions. TFs identified by MT-SDREM but not SDREM have a next to them and vice versa have a ◊ next to them. Note that TFs listed for the pairwise overlap are in addition to the ones listed for the overall overlap. Thus JUN in the I-SDREM column of H3N2 & H5N1 is not highlighted since it was identified by MT-SDREM for all three conditions.