Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 18;9(12):e115308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115308

Table 2. Pairwise comparison of changes in performance and physiological measures between all experimental groups.

Long Control % difference ±90% CL (ES) Short – Control % difference ±90% CL (ES) Short – Long % difference ±90% CL (ES)
TTPO (W) 10.4±4.3 (0.82)* 8.2±3.8 (0.67)# −2.1±3.9 (−0.22)
TT time(s) −6.1±2.2 (−0.80)# −4.6±1.9 (−0.62)# 1.6±2.6 (0.28)
PPO (W) 9.5±2.5 (0.89)# 5.5±2.7 (0.57)# −3.7±2.1 (−0.48)*
VO2 peak (L·min−1) 4.2±5.1 (0.37) 2.9±4.6 (0.27) −1.2±4.2 (−0.15)
OBLA (W) 6.8±4.9 (0.53)* 7.5±4.5 (0.60)* 0.7±3.5 (0.05)
ECO (W·L−1·min−1) 2.3±3.2 (0.43) 1.7±3.0 (0.26) −0.6±2.4 (−0.11)
GE (%) 3.6±3.3 (0.65) 1.7±2.9 (0.26) −1.9±2.5 (−0.34)

±90% confidence limits: add or subtract this number to the mean effect to obtain the 90% confidence limits for the true difference. (ES)  =  effect size; TTPO  =  Time-trial mean power output; TT time  =  performance time; PPO  =  peak power output; VO2 peak  =  peak oxygen uptake; OBLA  =  onset blood lactate accumulation; ECO  =  exercise economy; GE  =  gross efficiency.

*significantly different at p<0.05.

#

significantly different at p<0.01.