Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurochem. 2014 Oct 14;132(1):99–109. doi: 10.1111/jnc.12948

Figure 5. Fitting Simulated Data.

Figure 5

Illustrated are the results from analysis of simulated data under different conditions using the program “metabolic.m” in the supplementary material. The procedure is capable of computing a-h most accurately when exchange of glutamate and glutamine with α-ketoglutarate of astrocytes and neurons is quite different. This is demonstrated by finding the difference between the actual ratio of fc2a (acetyl-CoA labeled in positions 2) and fc3a (acetyl-CoA labeled in position 1 and 2) for a test model and the estimated fc3a/fc2a, using the synthetic data associated with this test model, as the input for the proposed procedure. Figure 5A shows that the error is small if g and h are considerably different from each other, but the procedure becomes less accurate in estimating a-h if g and h are nearly equal (error is highest on the diagonal). The noise plays a significant role in the precision of the computation (Figures 5B, 5C and 5D). With increasing the noise from 0 to 1 %, the procedure is less accurate in estimating a-h as represented by significantly worsening error.