Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 17;96(Suppl 1):34–41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00465

TABLE I.

Results of the Fixed-Registry-Effects Analysis Comparing C-C and M-HXLPE Implants

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)*
>28-mm C-C, Relative to All M-HXLPE ≤28-mm C-C, Relative to All M-HXLPE
Time in yr
 0 to 1 Ref. Ref.
 1 to 2 6.72 (5.07-8.92) 5.74 (4.20-7.80)
 2 to 3 8.24 (6.16-11.01) 7.00 (5.11-9.59)
 3 to 4 9.88 (7.37-13.24) 7.98 (5.82-10.95)
 4 to 5 10.84 (8.08-14.55) 8.80 (6.40-12.08)
 5 to 6 12.11 (9.00-16.30) 9.73 (7.07-13.40)
 6 to 7 13.04 (9.64-17.63) 10.41 (7.54-14.36)
 7 to 8 15.19 (11.12-20.75) 12.08 (8.67-16.83)
 8 to 9 15.84 (11.29-22.21) 12.52 (8.65-18.11)
 9 to 10 NA 14.09 (9.10-21.81)
Sex
 Male Ref. Ref.
 Female 1.09 (0.93-1.28) 0.98 (0.81-1.19)
Age in yr
 45 to 54 Ref. Ref.
 55 to 64 0.80 (0.66-0.96) 0.89 (0.71-1.12)
Fixed registry effects§
Bearing surface and size
 Overall NA 1.36 (1.09-1.68)
 0 to 2 yr# 0.77 (0.63-0.93) NA
 2 to 6 yr# 0.88 (0.74-1.05) NA
 6 to 9 yr# 0.93 (0.77-1.12) NA
*

Results are based on an iterative solution that updates the residual covariances until convergence. Confidence intervals are based on a Z distribution. NA = not applicable.

The estimated intercept was −5.69 (SE, 0.17).

The estimated intercept was −5.51 (SE, 0.19).

§

Fixed registry effects were included in this model, but the results are omitted from this table because a precondition of data sharing was no reporting of comparisons among registries.

#

The bearing effects over time are based on a combination of the main and interaction effects from the model.