Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Dec 19.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Psychiatry. 2014 Apr 29;19(7):762–773. doi: 10.1038/mp.2014.40

Table 2.

Table 2a. Known pathogenic CNVs associated with psychiatric disorders (deletions)
CNV Region a Location (mb) Freqcases Freqcontrol OR (CI) b EMP-1sided c (adjusted) EMP-2sided d (adjusted)
1q21.1 * chr1:145.0–148.0 5 1 6.27 (0.7–296.41) 0.048 (0.29)
2p16.3 (NRXN1 exons) * chr2:50.1–51.2 2 0 6.27 (0.24-Inf) 0.19 (0.57)
3q29 * chr3:195.7–197.3 6 0 16.32 (1.48-Inf) 0.009 (0.022)
7q11.23 chr7:72.7–74.1 0 0
7q36.3 (VIPR2) chr7:158.8–158.9 0 0
15q11.2 chr15:23.6–28.4 0 0
15q13.3 * chr15:30.9–33.5 7 2 4.39 (0.84–43.34) 0.05 (0.1)
16p13.11 chr16:15.4–16.3 3 4 0.94 (0.14–5.56) 1 (1) 1 (1)
16p11.2 distal * chr16:28.2–29.0 2 1 2.51 (0.13–147.88) 0.43 (0.80)
16p11.2 chr16:29.5–30.2 0 0
17q12 * chr17:34.8–36.2 0 0
22q11.2 * chr22:18.7–21.8 6 0 16.32 (1.48-Inf) 0.0037 (0.022)
Table 2b. Known pathogenic CNVs associated with psychiatric disorders (duplications)
CNV Region a Location (mb) Freqcases Freqcontrol OR (CI) b EMP-1sided c (adjusted) EMP-2sided d (adjusted)
1q21.1 chr1:145.0–148.0 2 1 2.51 (0.13–147.88) 0.36 (0.98)
2p16.3 (NRXN1) chr2:50.1–51.2 0 0
3q29 chr3:195.7–197.3 1 0 3.76 (0.03-Inf) 0.40 (0.88)
7q11.23 chr7:72.7–74.1 2 0 6.27 (0.24-Inf) 0.24 (0.57)
7q36.3 (VIPR2) * chr7:158.8–158.9 0 2 0.25 (0–6.68) 1 (1) 1 (1)
15q11.2 chr15:23.6–28.4 0 0
15q13.3 chr15:30.9–33.5 1 2 0.63 (0.01–12.05) 1 (1) 1 (1)
16p13.11 chr16:15.4–16.3 12 6 2.51 (0.87–8.16) 0.168 (0.713)
16p11.2 distal chr16:28.2–29.0 2 4 0.63 (0.06–4.38) 1 (1) 0.68 (1)
16p11.2 * chr16:29.5–30.2 10 2 6.28 (1.34–59) 0.0031 (0.022)
17q12 chr17:34.8–36.2 5 1 6.27 (0.7–296.41) 0.074 (0.318)
22q11.2 chr22:18.7–21.8 0 3 0.18 (0–3.03) 1 (1) 0.26 (0.83)
a

For NRXN1 in Table (2a), we considered all >100kb deletions disrupting exons (≥1bp overlap). For VIPR2 and NRXN1 in Table (2b), we considered all >100Kb CNV events that disrupted the gene (≥1bp overlap). For all other regions, we considered all >100kb CNV events that had >50% reciprocal overlap with a region (PLINK --cnv-union-overlap 0.5).

b

When 0 events occurred, ORs were estimated by applying the standard continuity correction that added a value of 0.5 to each cell of the 2x2 table.

c

Test was one-sided assuming higher rate in cases and statistical significance was estimated empirically by 100,000 permutations within batches. The multiple-testing-adjusted P value was obtained in PLINK using the default max-T method.

d

For simplicity, results for 2-sided tests were only shown when Freqcotnrol > Freqcase.

*

The star indicates previously implicated loci in SCZ.